Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for Involvement of Photosynthetic Processes in the Stomatal Response to CO2

Open access
Messinger, Susanna M., Buckley, Thomas N., Mott, Keith A.·2006·Plant Physiology

Abstract

Stomatal conductance (g s) typically declines in response to increasing intercellular CO2 concentration (c i). However, the mechanisms underlying this response are not fully understood. Recent work suggests that stomatal responses to c i and red light (RL) are linked to photosynthetic electron transport. We investigated the role of photosynthetic electron transport in the stomatal response to c i in intact leaves of cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) plants by examining the responses of g s and net CO2 assimilation rate to c i in light and darkness, in the presence and absence of the photosystem II inhibitor 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU), and at 2% and 21% ambient oxygen. Our results indicate that (1) g s and assimilation rate decline concurrently and with similar spatial patterns in response to DCMU; (2) the response of g s to c i changes slope in concert with the transition from Rubisco- to electron transport-limited photosynthesis at various irradiances and oxygen concentrations; (3) the response of g s to c i is similar in darkness and in DCMU-treated leaves, whereas the response in light in non-DCMU-treated leaves is much larger and has a different shape; (4) the response of g s to c i is insensitive to oxygen in DCMU-treated leaves or in darkness; and (5) stomata respond normally to RL when c i is held constant, indicating the RL response does not require a reduction in c i by mesophyll photosynthesis. Together, these results suggest that part of the stomatal response to c i involves the balance between photosynthetic electron transport and carbon reduction either in the mesophyll or in guard cell chloroplasts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.105.073676

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Messinger, S. M., Buckley, T. N., & Mott, K. A.
Venue
Plant Physiology
Published
2006-01-11
Volume
140
Issue
2
Pages
771-778
ISSN
  • 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2548
OpenAlex
W2073638269
Cited by
254
References
2
FWCI
12.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for Involvement of Photosynthetic Processes in the Stomatal Response to CO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.105.073676
The paper
Messinger, S. M., Buckley, T. N., & Mott, K. A. (2006). Evidence for Involvement of Photosynthetic Processes in the Stomatal Response to CO2. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.073676

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.