The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence for Involvement of Photosynthetic Processes in the Stomatal Response to CO2
Open accessAbstract
Stomatal conductance (g s) typically declines in response to increasing intercellular CO2 concentration (c i). However, the mechanisms underlying this response are not fully understood. Recent work suggests that stomatal responses to c i and red light (RL) are linked to photosynthetic electron transport. We investigated the role of photosynthetic electron transport in the stomatal response to c i in intact leaves of cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) plants by examining the responses of g s and net CO2 assimilation rate to c i in light and darkness, in the presence and absence of the photosystem II inhibitor 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU), and at 2% and 21% ambient oxygen. Our results indicate that (1) g s and assimilation rate decline concurrently and with similar spatial patterns in response to DCMU; (2) the response of g s to c i changes slope in concert with the transition from Rubisco- to electron transport-limited photosynthesis at various irradiances and oxygen concentrations; (3) the response of g s to c i is similar in darkness and in DCMU-treated leaves, whereas the response in light in non-DCMU-treated leaves is much larger and has a different shape; (4) the response of g s to c i is insensitive to oxygen in DCMU-treated leaves or in darkness; and (5) stomata respond normally to RL when c i is held constant, indicating the RL response does not require a reduction in c i by mesophyll photosynthesis. Together, these results suggest that part of the stomatal response to c i involves the balance between photosynthetic electron transport and carbon reduction either in the mesophyll or in guard cell chloroplasts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
phot1 and phot2 mediate blue light regulation of stomatal opening
Kinoshita, T., Doi, M., Suetsugu, N., Kagawa, T., Wada, M., & Shimazaki, K.-I. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/414656a · Cited by 899 · cited 1×
“The receptor for this response has yet to be identified unequivocally, and there is evidence supporting both zeaxanthin (Zeiger and Zhu, 1998; Talbott et al., 2003) and phototropins (Kinoshita et al., 2001; Doi et al., 2004) for this role.”
Background
Cited by
Light Regulation of Stomatal Movement
Shimazaki, K.-I., Doi, M., Assmann, S. M., & Kinoshita, T. (2007) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105434 · Cited by 915
An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level
DAMOUR, G., SIMONNEAU, T., COCHARD, H., & URBAN, L. (2010) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02181.x · Cited by 710
Metadata
- Authors
- Messinger, S. M., Buckley, T. N., & Mott, K. A.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-01-11
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 771-778
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2073638269
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for Involvement of Photosynthetic Processes in the Stomatal Response to CO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.105.073676
- The paper
- Messinger, S. M., Buckley, T. N., & Mott, K. A. (2006). Evidence for Involvement of Photosynthetic Processes in the Stomatal Response to CO2. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.073676
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.