The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gene Expression Programs during Shoot, Root, and Callus Development in Arabidopsis Tissue Culture
Open accessAbstract
Shoots can be regenerated from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsisthaliana) root explants in tissue culture through a two-step process requiring preincubation on an auxin-rich callus induction medium. Regenerating tissues can be directed along different developmental pathways leading to the formation of shoots, new roots, or callus by transferring to the appropriate organ induction medium. Using gene-profiling methods, we identified groups of genes that serve as molecular signatures of the different developmental processes, i.e. genes that were specifically up- or down-regulated on one developmental pathway, but not on others. One transcription factor gene that was up-regulated during early shoot development was RAP2.6L (At5g13330), a member of the ERF (ethylene response factor) subfamily B-4 of the ERF/APETALA2 transcription factor gene family. RAP2.6L functions in shoot regeneration because T-DNA knockdown mutations in the gene reduced the efficiency of shoot formation in tissue culture, but not normal embryo or seedling development. RAP2.6L promoter:β-glucuronidase fusions demonstrated that the up-regulation of the gene during shoot regeneration was, at least in part, transcriptionally controlled. The promoter:β-glucuronidase fusions also demonstrated that RAP2.6L expression was localized to the shoot and emerging leaves, but expression declined in the leaf lamina as leaves expanded. T-DNA knockdown mutations in RAP2.6L reduced the expression of many genes that are normally up-regulated during shoot development including CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON2 that is involved in shoot meristem specification. Thus, RAP2.6L appears to be part of a network involved in regulating the expression of many other genes in shoot regeneration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical significance for genomewide studies
Storey, J. D., & Tibshirani, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · Cited by 9,692
Genes involved in organ separation in Arabidopsis: an analysis of the cup-shaped cotyledon mutant.
Aida, M., Ishida, T., Fukaki, H., Fujisawa, H., & Tasaka, M. (1997) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.9.6.841 · Cited by 1,486
Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus
Allison, D. B., Cui, X., Page, G. P., & Sabripour, M. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1749 · Cited by 1,339
Cited by
Plant regeneration: cellular origins and molecular mechanisms
Ikeuchi, M., Ogawa, Y., Iwase, A., & Sugimoto, K. (2016) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.134668 · Cited by 592
Cellular, Molecular, and Physiological Aspects of In Vitro Plant Regeneration
Bidabadi, S. S., & Jain, S. M. (2020) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants9060702 · Cited by 268
Neelakandan, A. K., & Wang, K. (2012) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-011-1202-z · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Che, P., Lall, S., Nettleton, D., & Howell, S. H.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-05-05
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 620-637
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2129056803
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gene Expression Programs during Shoot, Root, and Callus Development in Arabidopsis Tissue Culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.106.081240
- The paper
- Che, P., Lall, S., Nettleton, D., & Howell, S. H. (2006). Gene Expression Programs during Shoot, Root, and Callus Development in Arabidopsis Tissue Culture. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.081240
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.