The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Mechanical Diversity of Stomata and Its Significance in Gas-Exchange Control
Open accessAbstract
Given that stomatal movement is ultimately a mechanical process and that stomata are morphologically and mechanically diverse, we explored the influence of stomatal mechanical diversity on leaf gas exchange and considered some of the constraints. Mechanical measurements were conducted on the guard cells of four different species exhibiting different stomatal morphologies, including three variants on the classical “kidney” form and one “dumb-bell” type; this information, together with gas-exchange measurements, was used to model and compare their respective operational characteristics. Based on evidence from scanning electron microscope images of cryo-sectioned leaves that were sampled under full sun and high humidity and from pressure probe measurements of the stomatal aperture versus guard cell turgor relationship at maximum and zero epidermal turgor, it was concluded that maximum stomatal apertures (and maximum leaf diffusive conductance) could not be obtained in at least one of the species (the grass Triticum aestivum) without a substantial reduction in subsidiary cell osmotic (and hence turgor) pressure during stomatal opening to overcome the large mechanical advantage of subsidiary cells. A mechanism for this is proposed, with a corollary being greatly accelerated stomatal opening and closure. Gas-exchange measurements on T. aestivum revealed the capability of very rapid stomatal movements, which may be explained by the unique morphology and mechanics of its dumb-bell-shaped stomata coupled with “see-sawing” of osmotic and turgor pressure between guard and subsidiary cells during stomatal opening or closure. Such properties might underlie the success of grasses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Maximum leaf conductance driven by CO 2 effects on stomatal size and density over geologic time
Franks, P. J., & Beerling, D. J. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0904209106 · Cited by 934
Self-citationImpact of stomatal density and morphology on water-use efficiency in a changing world
Bertolino, L. T., Caine, R. S., & Gray, J. E. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00225 · Cited by 706
Biochar enhances yield and quality of tomato under reduced irrigation
Akhtar, S. S., Li, G., Andersen, M. N., & Liu, F. (2014) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2014.02.016 · Cited by 495
Passive Origins of Stomatal Control in Vascular Plants
Brodribb, T. J., & McAdam, S. A. M. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1197985 · Cited by 469
Closing gaps: linking elements that control stomatal movement
Kollist, H., Nuhkat, M., & Roelfsema, M. R. G. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12832 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Franks, P. J., & Farquhar, G. D.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-11-17
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 78-87
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2128772567
- Cited by
- 701
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Mechanical Diversity of Stomata and Its Significance in Gas-Exchange Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.106.089367
- The paper
- Franks, P. J., & Farquhar, G. D. (2007). The Mechanical Diversity of Stomata and Its Significance in Gas-Exchange Control. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.089367
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.