The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular Evolution of Lysin Motif-Type Receptor-Like Kinases in Plants
Open accessAbstract
The lysin motif (LysM) domain is an ancient and ubiquitous protein module that binds peptidoglycan and structurally related molecules. A genomic survey in a large number of species spanning all kingdoms reveals that the combination of LysM and receptor kinase domains is present exclusively in plants. However, the particular biological functions and molecular evolution of this gene family remain largely unknown. We show that LysM domains in plant LysM proteins are highly diversified and that a minimum of six distinct types of LysM motifs exist in plant LysM kinase proteins and five additional types of LysM motifs exist in nonkinase plant LysM proteins. Further, motif similarities suggest that plant LysM motifs are ancient. Although phylogenetic signals are not sufficient to resolve the earliest relationships, plant LysM motifs may have arisen through common ancestry with LysM motifs in other kingdoms. Within plants, the gene family has evolved through local and segmental duplications. The family has undergone further duplication and diversification in legumes, where some LysM kinase genes function as receptors for bacterial nodulation factor. Two pairs of homeologous regions were identified in soybean (Glycine max) based on microsynteny and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Expression data show that most plant LysM kinase genes are expressed predominantly in the root and that orthologous LysM kinase genes share similar tissue expression patterns. We also examined synteny around plant LysM kinase genes to help reconstruct scenarios for the evolution of this important gene family.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Boller, T., & Felix, G. (2009) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105346 · Cited by 3,387
Pattern-recognition receptors in plant innate immunity
Zipfel, C. (2008) · Current Opinion in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.coi.2007.11.003 · Cited by 658
Wan, J., Tanaka, K., Zhang, X.-C., Son, G. H., Brechenmacher, L., Nguyen, T. H. N., & Stacey, G. (2012) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.112.201699 · Cited by 305
Self-citationLysM-Type Mycorrhizal Receptor Recruited for Rhizobium Symbiosis in Nonlegume Parasponia
Op den Camp, R., Streng, A., De Mita, S., Cao, Q., Polone, E., Liu, W., Ammiraju, J. S. S., Kudrna, D., Wing, R., Untergasser, A., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1198181 · Cited by 295
Lipo-chitooligosaccharide Signaling in Endosymbiotic Plant-Microbe Interactions
Gough, C., & Cullimore, J. (2011) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® · doi:10.1094/mpmi-01-11-0019 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, X.-C., Wu, X., Findley, S., Wan, J., Libault, M., Nguyen, H. T., Cannon, S. B., & Stacey, G.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-04-20
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 623-636
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2162891714
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Evolution of Lysin Motif-Type Receptor-Like Kinases in Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.107.097097
- The paper
- Zhang, X.-C., Wu, X., Findley, S., Wan, J., Libault, M., Nguyen, H. T., Cannon, S. B., & Stacey, G. (2007). Molecular Evolution of Lysin Motif-Type Receptor-Like Kinases in Plants. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.097097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.