The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glucan, Water Dikinase Activity Stimulates Breakdown of Starch Granules by Plastidial β-Amylases
Open accessAbstract
Glucan phosphorylating enzymes are required for normal mobilization of starch in leaves of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and potato (Solanum tuberosum), but mechanisms underlying this dependency are unknown. Using two different activity assays, we aimed to identify starch degrading enzymes from Arabidopsis, whose activity is affected by glucan phosphorylation. Breakdown of granular starch by a protein fraction purified from leaf extracts increased approximately 2-fold if the granules were simultaneously phosphorylated by recombinant potato glucan, water dikinase (GWD). Using matrix-assisted laser-desorption ionization mass spectrometry several putative starch-related enzymes were identified in this fraction, among them β-AMYLASE1 (BAM1; At3g23920) and ISOAMYLASE3 (ISA3; At4g09020). Experiments using purified recombinant enzymes showed that BAM1 activity with granules similarly increased under conditions of simultaneous starch phosphorylation. Purified recombinant potato ISA3 (StISA3) did not attack the granular starch significantly with or without glucan phosphorylation. However, starch breakdown by a mixture of BAM1 and StISA3 was 2 times higher than that by BAM1 alone and was further enhanced in the presence of GWD and ATP. Similar to BAM1, maltose release from granular starch by purified recombinant BAM3 (At4g17090), another plastid-localized β-amylase isoform, increased 2- to 3-fold if the granules were simultaneously phosphorylated by GWD. BAM activity in turn strongly stimulated the GWD-catalyzed phosphorylation. The interdependence between the activities of GWD and BAMs offers an explanation for the severe starch excess phenotype of GWD-deficient mutants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The roles of amylose and amylopectin in the gelation and retrogradation of starch
Miles, M. J., Morris, V. J., Orford, P. D., & Ring, S. G. (1985) · Carbohydrate Research · doi:10.1016/s0008-6215(00)90778-x · Cited by 1,202
Cited by
Starch: its metabolism, evolution, and biotechnological modification in plants
Zeeman, S. C., Kossmann, J., & Smith, A. M. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112301 · Cited by 1,095
Formation of starch in plant cells
Pfister, B., & Zeeman, S. C. (2016) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-016-2250-x · Cited by 423
Michel, G., Tonon, T., Scornet, D., Cock, J. M., & Kloareg, B. (2010) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03345.x · Cited by 188
Metadata
- Authors
- Edner, C., Li, J., Albrecht, T., Mahlow, S., Hejazi, M., Hussain, H., Kaplan, F., Guy, C., Smith, S. M., Steup, M., & Ritte, G.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-07-13
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-28
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2083664617
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glucan, Water Dikinase Activity Stimulates Breakdown of Starch Granules by Plastidial β-Amylases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.107.104224
- The paper
- Edner, C., Li, J., Albrecht, T., Mahlow, S., Hejazi, M., Hussain, H., Kaplan, F., Guy, C., Smith, S. M., Steup, M., & Ritte, G. (2007). Glucan, Water Dikinase Activity Stimulates Breakdown of Starch Granules by Plastidial β-Amylases. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.104224
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.