The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Loss of Halophytism by Interference with SOS1 Expression
Open accessAbstract
The contribution of SOS1 (for Salt Overly Sensitive 1), encoding a sodium/proton antiporter, to plant salinity tolerance was analyzed in wild-type and RNA interference (RNAi) lines of the halophytic Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana)-relative Thellungiella salsuginea. Under all conditions, SOS1 mRNA abundance was higher in Thellungiella than in Arabidopsis. Ectopic expression of the Thellungiella homolog ThSOS1 suppressed the salt-sensitive phenotype of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain lacking sodium ion (Na+) efflux transporters and increased salt tolerance of wild-type Arabidopsis. thsos1-RNAi lines of Thellungiella were highly salt sensitive. A representative line, thsos1-4, showed faster Na+ accumulation, more severe water loss in shoots under salt stress, and slower removal of Na+ from the root after removal of stress compared with the wild type. thsos1-4 showed drastically higher sodium-specific fluorescence visualized by CoroNa-Green, a sodium-specific fluorophore, than the wild type, inhibition of endocytosis in root tip cells, and cell death in the adjacent elongation zone. After prolonged stress, Na+ accumulated inside the pericycle in thsos1-4, while sodium was confined in vacuoles of epidermis and cortex cells in the wild type. RNAi-based interference of SOS1 caused cell death in the root elongation zone, accompanied by fragmentation of vacuoles, inhibition of endocytosis, and apoplastic sodium influx into the stele and hence the shoot. Reduction in SOS1 expression changed Thellungiella that normally can grow in seawater-strength sodium chloride solutions into a plant as sensitive to Na+ as Arabidopsis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Role of Na+ and K+ Transporters in Salt Stress Adaptation in Glycophytes
Assaha, D. V. M., Ueda, A., Saneoka, H., Al-Yahyai, R., & Yaish, M. W. (2017) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00509 · Cited by 914
Protein kinases in plant responses to drought, salt, and cold stress
Chen, X., Ding, Y., Yang, Y., Song, C., Wang, B., Yang, S., Guo, Y., & Gong, Z. (2021) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.13061 · Cited by 608
Sodium (Na+) homeostasis and salt tolerance of plants
Hasegawa, P. M. (2013) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.03.001 · Cited by 498
Plant Salt Stress: Adaptive Responses, Tolerance Mechanism and Bioengineering for Salt Tolerance
Muchate, N. S., Nikalje, G. C., Rajurkar, N. S., Suprasanna, P., & Nikam, T. D. (2016) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/s12229-016-9173-y · Cited by 359
Comparative physiology of elemental distributions in plants
Conn, S., & Gilliham, M. (2010) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcq027 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Oh, D.-H., Leidi, E., Zhang, Q., Hwang, S.-M., Li, Y., Quintero, F. J., Jiang, X., D'Urzo, M. P., Lee, S. Y., Zhao, Y., Bahk, J. D., Bressan, R. A., Yun, D.-J., Pardo, J. M., & Bohnert, H. J.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-07-01
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 210-222
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W1996783504
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Loss of Halophytism by Interference with SOS1 Expression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.109.137802
- The paper
- Oh, D.-H., Leidi, E., Zhang, Q., Hwang, S.-M., Li, Y., Quintero, F. J., Jiang, X., D'Urzo, M. P., Lee, S. Y., Zhao, Y., Bahk, J. D., Bressan, R. A., Yun, D.-J., Pardo, J. M., & Bohnert, H. J. (2009). Loss of Halophytism by Interference with SOS1 Expression. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.137802
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.