The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Imaging and Analysis Platform for Automatic Phenotyping and Trait Ranking of Plant Root Systems
Open accessAbstract
The ability to nondestructively image and automatically phenotype complex root systems, like those of rice (Oryza sativa), is fundamental to identifying genes underlying root system architecture (RSA). Although root systems are central to plant fitness, identifying genes responsible for RSA remains an underexplored opportunity for crop improvement. Here we describe a nondestructive imaging and analysis system for automated phenotyping and trait ranking of RSA. Using this system, we image rice roots from 12 genotypes. We automatically estimate RSA traits previously identified as important to plant function. In addition, we expand the suite of features examined for RSA to include traits that more comprehensively describe monocot RSA but that are difficult to measure with traditional methods. Using 16 automatically acquired phenotypic traits for 2,297 images from 118 individuals, we observe (1) wide variation in phenotypes among the genotypes surveyed; and (2) greater intergenotype variance of RSA features than variance within a genotype. RSA trait values are integrated into a computational pipeline that utilizes supervised learning methods to determine which traits best separate two genotypes, and then ranks the traits according to their contribution to each pairwise comparison. This trait-ranking step identifies candidate traits for subsequent quantitative trait loci analysis and demonstrates that depth and average radius are key contributors to differences in rice RSA within our set of genotypes. Our results suggest a strong genetic component underlying rice RSA. This work enables the automatic phenotyping of RSA of individuals within mapping populations, providing an integrative framework for quantitative trait loci analysis of RSA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
TUBEROSA, R. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf134 · Cited by 397
Steele, K. A., Price, A. H., Shashidhar, H. E., & Witcombe, J. R. (2006) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-005-0110-4 · Cited by 370
Cited by
Yang, W., Feng, H., Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Doonan, J. H., Batchelor, W. D., Xiong, L., & Yan, J. (2020) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2020.01.008 · Cited by 961
Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era
Tuberosa, R. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00347 · Cited by 558
The roots of a new green revolution
Herder, G. D., Van Isterdael, G., Beeckman, T., & De Smet, I. (2010) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2010.08.009 · Cited by 508
Developing X-ray Computed Tomography to non-invasively image 3-D root systems architecture in soil
Mooney, S. J., Pridmore, T. P., Helliwell, J., & Bennett, M. J. (2012) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-011-1039-9 · Cited by 454
Kell, D. B. (2011) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcr175 · Cited by 439
Metadata
- Authors
- Iyer-Pascuzzi, A. S., Symonova, O., Mileyko, Y., Hao, Y., Belcher, H., Harer, J., Weitz, J. S., & Benfey, P. N.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-01-27
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1148-1157
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2157779872
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imaging and Analysis Platform for Automatic Phenotyping and Trait Ranking of Plant Root Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.109.150748
- The paper
- Iyer-Pascuzzi, A. S., Symonova, O., Mileyko, Y., Hao, Y., Belcher, H., Harer, J., Weitz, J. S., & Benfey, P. N. (2010). Imaging and Analysis Platform for Automatic Phenotyping and Trait Ranking of Plant Root Systems. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.150748
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.