The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Natural Variation of Root Hydraulics in Arabidopsis Grown in Normal and Salt-Stressed Conditions
Open accessAbstract
To gain insights into the natural variation of root hydraulics and its molecular components, genotypic differences related to root water transport and plasma membrane intrinsic protein (PIP) aquaporin expression were investigated in 13 natural accessions of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). The hydraulic conductivity of excised root systems (Lpr) showed a 2-fold variation among accessions. The contribution of aquaporins to water uptake was characterized using as inhibitors mercury, propionic acid, and azide. The aquaporin-dependent and -independent paths of water transport made variable contributions to the total hydraulic conductivity in the different accessions. The distinct suberization patterns observed among accessions were not correlated with their root hydraulic properties. Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction revealed, by contrast, a positive overall correlation between Lpr and certain highly expressed PIP transcripts. Root hydraulic responses to salt stress were characterized in a subset of five accessions (Bulhary-1, Catania-1, Columbia-0, Dijon-M, and Monte-Tosso-0 [Mr-0]). Lpr was down-regulated in all accessions except Mr-0. In Mr-0 and Catania-1, cortical cell hydraulic conductivity was unresponsive to salt, whereas it was down-regulated in the three other accessions. By contrast, the five accessions showed qualitatively similar aquaporin transcriptional profiles in response to salt. The overall work provides clues on how hydraulic regulation allows plant adaptation to salt stress. It also shows that a wide range of root hydraulic profiles, as previously reported in various species, can be observed in a single model species. This work paves the way for a quantitative genetics analysis of root hydraulics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines
Atwell, S., Huang, Y. S., Vilhjálmsson, B. J., Willems, G., Horton, M., Li, Y., Meng, D., Platt, A., Tarone, A. M., Hu, T. T., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08800 · Cited by 1,780
Boursiac, Y., Chen, S., Luu, D.-T., Sorieul, M., van den Dries, N., & Maurel, C. (2005) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.105.065029 · Cited by 566
Self-citationQuantitative Trait Loci and Crop Performance under Abiotic Stress: Where Do We Stand?: Table I.
Collins, N. C., Tardieu, F., & Tuberosa, R. (2008) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.108.118117 · Cited by 559
Cited by
Maurel, C., Boursiac, Y., Luu, D.-T., Santoni, V., Shahzad, Z., & Verdoucq, L. (2015) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00008.2015 · Cited by 940
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sutka, M., Li, G., Boudet, J., Boursiac, Y., Doumas, P., & Maurel, C.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-01-06
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1264-1276
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2164979364
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural Variation of Root Hydraulics in Arabidopsis Grown in Normal and Salt-Stressed Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.110.163113
- The paper
- Sutka, M., Li, G., Boudet, J., Boursiac, Y., Doumas, P., & Maurel, C. (2011). Natural Variation of Root Hydraulics in Arabidopsis Grown in Normal and Salt-Stressed Conditions. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.163113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.