The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distribution of SUN, OVATE, LC , and FAS in the Tomato Germplasm and the Relationship to Fruit Shape Diversity
Open accessAbstract
Phenotypic diversity within cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is particularly evident for fruit shape and size. Four genes that control tomato fruit shape have been cloned. SUN and OVATE control elongated shape whereas FASCIATED (FAS) and LOCULE NUMBER (LC) control fruit locule number and flat shape. We investigated the distribution of the fruit shape alleles in the tomato germplasm and evaluated their contribution to morphology in a diverse collection of 368 predominantly tomato and tomato var. cerasiforme accessions. Fruits were visually classified into eight shape categories that were supported by objective measurements obtained from image analysis using the Tomato Analyzer software. The allele distribution of SUN, OVATE, LC, and FAS in all accessions was strongly associated with fruit shape classification. We also genotyped 116 representative accessions with additional 25 markers distributed evenly across the genome. Through a model-based clustering we demonstrated that shape categories, germplasm classes, and the shape genes were nonrandomly distributed among five genetic clusters (P < 0.001), implying that selection for fruit shape genes was critical to subpopulation differentiation within cultivated tomato. Our data suggested that the LC, FAS, and SUN mutations arose in the same ancestral population while the OVATE mutation arose in a separate lineage. Furthermore, LC, OVATE, and FAS mutations may have arisen prior to domestication or early during the selection of cultivated tomato whereas the SUN mutation appeared to be a postdomestication event arising in Europe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fruit Development and Ripening
Seymour, G. B., Østergaard, L., Chapman, N. H., Knapp, S., & Martin, C. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120057 · Cited by 658
Water loss of fresh fruit: Influencing pre-harvest, harvest and postharvest factors
Lufu, R., Ambaw, A., & Opara, U. L. (2020) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109519 · Cited by 373
The Chemical Interactions Underlying Tomato Flavor Preferences
Tieman, D., Bliss, P., McIntyre, L. M., Blandon-Ubeda, A., Bies, D., Odabasi, A. Z., Rodríguez, G. R., van der Knaap, E., Taylor, M. G., Goulet, C., et al. (2012) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.016 · Cited by 366
Self-citationGenomic variation in tomato, from wild ancestors to contemporary breeding accessions
Blanca, J., Montero-Pau, J., Sauvage, C., Bauchet, G., Illa, E., Díez, M. J., Francis, D., Causse, M., van der Knaap, E., & Cañizares, J. (2015) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1444-1 · Cited by 273
Self-citationWeber, N., Halpin, C., Hannah, L. C., Jez, J. M., Kough, J., & Parrott, W. (2012) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.112.204271 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodríguez, G. R., Muños, S., Anderson, C., Sim, S.-C., Michel, A., Causse, M., Gardener, B. B. M., Francis, D., & van der Knaap, E.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-03-25
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 275-285
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2130026674
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution of SUN, OVATE, LC , and FAS in the Tomato Germplasm and the Relationship to Fruit Shape Diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.110.167577
- The paper
- Rodríguez, G. R., Muños, S., Anderson, C., Sim, S.-C., Michel, A., Causse, M., Gardener, B. B. M., Francis, D., & van der Knaap, E. (2011). Distribution of SUN, OVATE, LC , and FAS in the Tomato Germplasm and the Relationship to Fruit Shape Diversity. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.167577
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.