The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Green Light Induces Shade Avoidance Symptoms
Open accessAbstract
Light quality and quantity affect plant adaptation to changing light conditions. Certain wavelengths in the visible and near-visible spectrum are known to have discrete effects on plant growth and development, and the effects of red, far-red, blue, and ultraviolet light have been well described. In this report, an effect of green light on Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) rosette architecture is demonstrated using a narrow-bandwidth light-emitting diode-based lighting system. When green light was added to a background of constant red and blue light, plants exhibited elongation of petioles and upward leaf reorientation, symptoms consistent with those observed in a shaded light environment. The same green light-induced phenotypes were also observed in phytochrome (phy) and cryptochrome (cry) mutant backgrounds. To explore the molecular mechanism underlying the green light-induced response, the accumulation of shade-induced transcripts was measured in response to enriched green light environments. Transcripts that have been demonstrated to increase in abundance under far-red-induced shade avoidance conditions either decrease or exhibit no change when green light is added. However, normal far-red light-associated transcript accumulation patterns are observed in cryptochrome mutants grown with supplemental green light, indicating that the green-absorbing form of cryptochrome is the photoreceptor active in limiting the green light induction of shade-associated transcripts. These results indicate that shade symptoms can be induced by the addition of green light and that cryptochrome receptors and an unknown light sensor participate in acclimation to the enriched green environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Light-Regulated Plant Growth and Development
Kami, C., Lorrain, S., Hornitschek, P., & Fankhauser, C. (2010) · Current Topics in Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/s0070-2153(10)91002-8 · Cited by 927
Franklin, K. A. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02507.x · Cited by 801
Cited by
Casal, J. J. (2012) · The Arabidopsis Book · doi:10.1199/tab.0157 · Cited by 382
Don’t ignore the green light: exploring diverse roles in plant processes
Smith, H. L., McAusland, L., & Murchie, E. H. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erx098 · Cited by 359
Shade avoidance: phytochrome signalling and other aboveground neighbour detection cues
Pierik, R., & de Wit, M. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ert389 · Cited by 298
Landi, M., Zivcak, M., Sytar, O., Brestic, M., & Allakhverdiev, S. I. (2020) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics · doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2019.148131 · Cited by 294
Stress-induced flowering: the third category of flowering response
Takeno, K. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erw272 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, T., Maruhnich, S. A., & Folta, K. M.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-08-18
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1528-1536
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2078356277
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green Light Induces Shade Avoidance Symptoms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.111.180661
- The paper
- Zhang, T., Maruhnich, S. A., & Folta, K. M. (2011). Green Light Induces Shade Avoidance Symptoms. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.180661
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.