The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrative Comparative Analyses of Transcript and Metabolite Profiles from Pepper and Tomato Ripening and Development Stages Uncovers Species-Specific Patterns of Network Regulatory Behavior
Open accessAbstract
Integrative comparative analyses of transcript and metabolite levels from climacteric and nonclimacteric fruits can be employed to unravel the similarities and differences of the underlying regulatory processes. To this end, we conducted combined gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and heterologous microarray hybridization assays in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum; climacteric) and pepper (Capsicum chilense; nonclimacteric) fruits across development and ripening. Computational methods from multivariate and network-based analyses successfully revealed the difference between the covariance structures of the integrated data sets. Moreover, our results suggest that both fruits have similar ethylene-mediated signaling components; however, their regulation is different and may reflect altered ethylene sensitivity or regulators other than ethylene in pepper. Genes involved in ethylene biosynthesis were not induced in pepper fruits. Nevertheless, genes downstream of ethylene perception such as cell wall metabolism genes, carotenoid biosynthesis genes, and the never-ripe receptor were clearly induced in pepper as in tomato fruit. While signaling sensitivity or actual signals may differ between climacteric and nonclimacteric fruit, the evidence described here suggests that activation of a common set of ripening genes influences metabolic traits. Also, a coordinate regulation of transcripts and the accumulation of key organic acids, including malate, citrate, dehydroascorbate, and threonate, in pepper fruit were observed. Therefore, the integrated analysis allows us to uncover additional information for the comprehensive understanding of biological events relevant to metabolic regulation during climacteric and nonclimacteric fruit development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How does multiple testing correction work?
Noble, W. S. (2009) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1209-1135 · Cited by 772
Martínez, S., López, M., González-Raurich, M., & Bernardo Alvarez, >. (2005) · International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/09637480500081936 · Cited by 112
Cited by
McAtee, P., Karim, S., Schaffer, R., & David, K. (2013) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00079 · Cited by 485
Wang, R., Shu, P., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Du, K., Xie, Y., Li, M., Ma, T., et al. (2022) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17618 · Cited by 283
Sumner, L. W., Lei, Z., Nikolau, B. J., & Saito, K. (2015) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/c4np00072b · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Osorio, S., Alba, R., Nikoloski, Z., Kochevenko, A., Fernie, A. R., & Giovannoni, J. J.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-08-01
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1713-1729
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2100488313
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrative Comparative Analyses of Transcript and Metabolite Profiles from Pepper and Tomato Ripening and Development Stages Uncovers Species-Specific Patterns of Network Regulatory Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.112.199711
- The paper
- Osorio, S., Alba, R., Nikoloski, Z., Kochevenko, A., Fernie, A. R., & Giovannoni, J. J. (2012). Integrative Comparative Analyses of Transcript and Metabolite Profiles from Pepper and Tomato Ripening and Development Stages Uncovers Species-Specific Patterns of Network Regulatory Behavior. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.199711
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.