The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antioxidant Response to NaCl Stress in a Control and an NaCl-Tolerant Cotton Cell Line Grown in the Presence of Paraquat, Buthionine Sulfoximine, and Exogenous Glutathione
Open accessAbstract
A cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) control and NaCl-tolerant cell line (cv Coker 312) were grown on media with or without NaCl in the presence or absence of paraquat, buthionine sulfoximine, and oxidized glutathione. On medium with 150 mM NaCl the NaCl-tolerant cell line exhibited no reduction in growth, whereas a 96% reduction was observed in the control line. The NaCl-tolerant cell line that was grown on 150 mM NaCl exhibited significantly greater catalase (341%), peroxidase (319%), glutathione reductase (287%), ascorbate peroxidase (450%), [gamma]-glutamylcysteine synthetase (224%), and glutathione S-transferase (500%) activities than the intolerant control. The NaCl-tolerant cell line had a significantly lower dehydroascorbic acid/ascorbic acid ratio. Paraquat reduced growth by 20 and 53.7%, respectively, in the NaCl-tolerant and control cell line. The NaCl-tolerant cell line also showed a slight tolerance to buthionine sulfoximine. In the buthionine sulfoximine experiments reduced glutathione restored growth in both cell lines, whereas oxidized glutathione restored growth only in the NaCl-tolerant cell line. These data indicate that the NaCl-tolerant cell line exhibited a cross-tolerance to a variety of stress variables and had a more active ascorbate-glutathione cycle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hydrogen Peroxide is Scavenged by Ascorbate-specific Peroxidase in Spinach Chloroplasts
Nakano, Y., & Asada, K. (1981) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076232 · Cited by 10,809
Griffith, O. W., & Meister, A. (1979) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)35980-5 · Cited by 1,683
Selective Modification of Glutathione Metabolism
Meister, A. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6836290 · Cited by 1,267
Cited by
Biotechnological approach of improving plant salt tolerance using antioxidants as markers
Ashraf, M. (2009) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.003 · Cited by 1,137
Hernández, J. A., Jiménez, A., Mullineaux, P., & Sevilia, F. (2000) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00602.x · Cited by 837
Glutathione as an Antioxidant and Regulatory Molecule in Plants Under Abiotic Stress Conditions
Szalai, G., Kellős, T., Galiba, G., & Kocsy, G. (2009) · Journal of Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/s00344-008-9075-2 · Cited by 414
Raza, S. H., Athar, H. R., Ashraf, M., & Hameed, A. (2007) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.12.009 · Cited by 219
Responses of L. to lead and salt-induced oxidative stress
IRFANQURESHI, M., ISRAR, M., ABDIN, M., & IQBAL, M. (2005) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.03.014 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Gossett, D. R., Banks, S. W., Millhollon, E. P., & Lucas, M. C.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-10-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 803-809
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W1526402033
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antioxidant Response to NaCl Stress in a Control and an NaCl-Tolerant Cotton Cell Line Grown in the Presence of Paraquat, Buthionine Sulfoximine, and Exogenous Glutathione. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.112.2.803
- The paper
- Gossett, D. R., Banks, S. W., Millhollon, E. P., & Lucas, M. C. (1996). Antioxidant Response to NaCl Stress in a Control and an NaCl-Tolerant Cotton Cell Line Grown in the Presence of Paraquat, Buthionine Sulfoximine, and Exogenous Glutathione. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.2.803
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
