The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cellular Basis of Hypocotyl Growth in Arabidopsis thaliana
Open accessAbstract
The Arabidopsis thaliana hypocotyl is widely used to study the effects of light and plant growth factors on cell elongation. To provide a framework for the molecular-genetic analysis of cell elongation in this organ, here we describe, at the cellular level, its morphology and growth and identify a number of characteristic, developmental differences between light-grown and dark-grown hypocotyls. First, in the light epidermal cells show a characteristic differentiation that is not observed in the dark. Second, elongation growth of this organ does not involve significant cortical or epidermal cell divisions. However, endoreduplication occurs, as revealed by the presence of 4C and 8C nuclei. In addition, 16C nuclei were found specifically in dark-grown seedlings. Third, in the dark epidermal cells elongate along a steep, acropetal spatial and temporal gradient along the hypocotyl. In contrast, in the light all epidermal cells elongated continuously during the entire growth period. These morphological and physiological differences, in combination with previously reported genetic data (T. Desnos, V. Orbovic, C. Bellini, J. Kronenberger, M. Caboche, J. Traas, H. Hofte [1996] Development 122: 683–693), illustrate that light does not simply inhibit hypocotyl growth in a cell-autonomous fashion, but that the observed growth response to light is a part of an integrated developmental change throughout the elongating organ.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Auxin-resistant mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana with an altered morphology
Estelle, M. A., & Somerville, C. (1987) · Molecular and General Genetics MGG · doi:10.1007/bf00333575 · Cited by 576
Cited by
The Cell Biology of Cellulose Synthesis
McFarlane, H. E., Döring, A., & Persson, S. (2014) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040240 · Cited by 623
Shpak, E. D., Berthiaume, C. T., Hill, E. J., & Torii, K. U. (2004) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.01028 · Cited by 432
Ding, Z., Galván-Ampudia, C. S., Demarsy, E., Łangowski, Ł., Kleine-Vehn, J., Fan, Y., Morita, M. T., Tasaka, M., Fankhauser, C., Offringa, R., et al. (2011) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2208 · Cited by 330
Strigolactones stimulate internode elongation independently of gibberellins
de Saint Germain, A., Ligerot, Y., Dun, E. A., Pillot, J.-P., Ross, J. J., Beveridge, C. A., & Rameau, C. (2013) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.113.220541 · Cited by 166
Burn, J. E., Hurley, U. A., Birch, R. J., Arioli, T., Cork, A., & Williamson, R. E. (2002) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01483.x · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Gendreau, E., Traas, J., Desnos, T., Grandjean, O., Caboche, M., & Hofte, H.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-05-01
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 295-305
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2046198618
- Cited by
- 679
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellular Basis of Hypocotyl Growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.114.1.295
- The paper
- Gendreau, E., Traas, J., Desnos, T., Grandjean, O., Caboche, M., & Hofte, H. (1997). Cellular Basis of Hypocotyl Growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.1.295
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.