The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biochemical Analysis of Plant Protection Afforded by a Nonpathogenic Endophytic Mutant of Colletotrichum magna 1
Open accessAbstract
A nonpathogenic mutant ofColletotrichum magna (path-1) was previously shown to protect watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus) seedlings from anthracnose disease elicited by wild-type C. magna. Disease protection was observed in stems of path-1-colonized cucurbits but not in cotyledons, indicating that path-1 conferred tissue-specific and/or localized protection. Plant biochemical indicators of a localized and systemic (peroxidase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, lignin, and salicylic acid) “plant-defense” response were investigated in anthracnose-resistant and -susceptible cultivars of cucurbit seedlings exposed to four treatments: (1) water (control), (2) path-1 conidia, (3) wild-type conidia, and (4) challenge conditions (inoculation into path-1 conidia for 48 h and then exposure to wild-type conidia). Collectively, these analyses indicated that disease protection in path-1-colonized plants was correlated with the ability of these plants to mount a defense response more rapidly and to equal or greater levels than plants exposed to wild-type C. magna alone. Watermelon plants colonized with path-1 were also protected against disease caused by Colletotrichumorbiculare and Fusarium oxysporum. A model based on the kinetics of plant-defense activation is presented to explain the mechanism of path-1-conferred disease protection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phenolic Compounds and Their Role in Disease Resistance
Nicholson, R. L., & Hammerschmidt, R. (1992) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.py.30.090192.002101 · Cited by 1,400
Cited by
Invasive Plant Suppresses the Growth of Native Tree Seedlings by Disrupting Belowground Mutualisms
Stinson, K. A., Campbell, S. A., Powell, J. R., Wolfe, B. E., Callaway, R. M., Thelen, G. C., Hallett, S. G., Prati, D., & Klironomos, J. N. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040140 · Cited by 826
Root Exudates Regulate Soil Fungal Community Composition and Diversity
Broeckling, C. D., Broz, A. K., Bergelson, J., Manter, D. K., & Vivanco, J. M. (2008) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02188-07 · Cited by 803
Thermotolerance Generated by Plant/Fungal Symbiosis
Redman, R. S., Sheehan, K. B., Stout, R. G., Rodriguez, R. J., & Henson, J. M. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1078055 · Cited by 707
Self-citationInduction of abiotic stress tolerance in plants by endophytic microbes
Lata, R., Chowdhury, S., Gond, S. K., & White, J. F. (2018) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/lam.12855 · Cited by 544
Plant infection and the establishment of fungal biotrophy
Mendgen, K., & Hahn, M. (2002) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02297-5 · Cited by 468
Metadata
- Authors
- Redman, R. S., Freeman, S., Clifton, D. R., Morrel, J., Brown, G., & Rodriguez, R. J.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-02-01
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 795-804
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2137879995
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.