The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Removal of Feedback Inhibition of Δ1-Pyrroline-5-Carboxylate Synthetase Results in Increased Proline Accumulation and Protection of Plants from Osmotic Stress
Open accessAbstract
The Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS; EC not assigned) is the rate-limiting enzyme in proline (Pro) biosynthesis in plants and is subject to feedback inhibition by Pro. It has been suggested that the feedback regulation of P5CS is lost in plants under stress conditions. We compared Pro levels in transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants expressing a wild-type form of Vigna aconitifolia P5CS and a mutated form of the enzyme (P5CSF129A) whose feedback inhibition by Pro was removed by site-directed mutagenesis. Transgenic plants expressing P5CSF129A accumulated about 2-fold more Pro than the plants expressing V. aconitifolia wild-type P5CS. This difference was further increased in plants treated with 200 mm NaCl. These results demonstrated that the feedback regulation of P5CS plays a role in controlling the level of Pro in plants under both normal and stress conditions. The elevated Pro also reduced free radical levels in response to osmotic stress, as measured by malondialdehyde production, and significantly improved the ability of the transgenic seedlings to grow in medium containing up to 200 mm NaCl. These findings shed new light on the regulation of Pro biosynthesis in plants and the role of Pro in reducing oxidative stress induced by osmotic stress, in addition to its accepted role as an osmolyte.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies
Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P., & Teare, I. D. (1973) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf00018060 · Cited by 20,967
Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts
Heath, R. L., & Packer, L. (1968) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1 · Cited by 11,413
Cited by
Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance
Ashraf, M., & Foolad, M. R. (2007) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006 · Cited by 4,776
Proline accumulation in plants: a review
Verbruggen, N., & Hermans, C. (2008) · Amino Acids · doi:10.1007/s00726-008-0061-6 · Cited by 1,894
Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salt‐stress responses
Yang, Y., & Guo, Y. (2018) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14920 · Cited by 1,631
Role of DREB transcription factors in abiotic and biotic stress tolerance in plants
Agarwal, P. K., Agarwal, P., Reddy, M. K., & Sopory, S. K. (2006) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-006-0204-8 · Cited by 1,050
Drought‐ and desiccation‐induced modulation of gene expression in plants
Ramanjulu, S., & Bartels, D. (2002) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00764.x · Cited by 481
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, Z., Lakkineni, K., Zhang, Z., & Verma, D. P. S.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-04-01
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1129-1136
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2137228539
- Cited by
- 804
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Removal of Feedback Inhibition of Δ1-Pyrroline-5-Carboxylate Synthetase Results in Increased Proline Accumulation and Protection of Plants from Osmotic Stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.122.4.1129
- The paper
- Hong, Z., Lakkineni, K., Zhang, Z., & Verma, D. P. S. (2000). Removal of Feedback Inhibition of Δ1-Pyrroline-5-Carboxylate Synthetase Results in Increased Proline Accumulation and Protection of Plants from Osmotic Stress. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.122.4.1129
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.