The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Direct Measurement of Aluminum Uptake and Distribution in Single Cells of Chara corallina
Open accessAbstract
Quantitative information on the uptake and distribution of Al at the cellular level is required to understand mechanisms of Al toxicity, but direct measurement of uptake across the plasma membrane has remained elusive. We measured rates of Al transport across membranes in single cells of Chara corallina using the rare26Al isotope, an emerging technology (accelerator mass spectrometry), and a surgical technique for isolating subcellular compartments. Accumulation of Al in the cell wall dominated total uptake (71–318 μg m−2 min−1), although transport across the plasma membrane was detectable (71–540 ng m−2 min−1) within 30 min of exposure. Transport across the tonoplast was initially negligible, but accelerated to rates approximating uptake across the plasma membrane. The avacuolate protoplasm showed signs of saturation after 60 min, but continued movement across the plasma membrane was supported by sequestration in the vacuole. Saturation of all compartments was observed after 12 to 24 h. Accumulation of Al in the cell wall reflected variation in {Al3+} induced by changes in Al supply or complexing ligands, but was unaffected by pH. In contrast, transport across the plasma membrane peaked at pH 4.3 and increased when {Al3+} was reduced by complexing ligands. Cold temperature (4°C) reduced accumulation in the cell wall and protoplasm, whereas 2,4-dinitrophenol andm-chlorocarbonylcyanidephenyl hydrazone increased membrane transport by 12- to 13-fold. Our data suggest that the cell wall is the major site of Al accumulation. Nonetheless, membrane transport occurs within minutes of exposure and is supported by subsequent sequestration in the vacuole. The rapid delivery of Al to the protoplasm suggests that intracellular lesions may be possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Physiological functions of beneficial elements
Pilon-Smits, E. A., Quinn, C. F., Tapken, W., Malagoli, M., & Schiavon, M. (2009) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2009.04.009 · Cited by 786
The Physiology, Genetics and Molecular Biology of Plant Aluminum Resistance and Toxicity
Kochian, L. V., Piñeros, M. A., & Hoekenga, O. A. (2005) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-004-1158-7 · Cited by 687
The physiology, genetics and molecular biology of plant aluminum resistance and toxicity
Kochian, L. V., Piñeros, M. A., & Hoekenga, O. A. (2005) · Plant Ecophysiology · doi:10.1007/1-4020-4099-7_9 · Cited by 572
Yamamoto, Y., Kobayashi, Y., Devi, S. R., Rikiishi, S., & Matsumoto, H. (2002) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.010417 · Cited by 512
Horst, W. J., Wang, Y., & Eticha, D. (2010) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcq053 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, G. J., McDonald-Stephens, J. L., Hunter, D. B., Bertsch, P. M., Elmore, D., Rengel, Z., & Reid, R. J.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-07-01
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 987-996
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2123024025
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct Measurement of Aluminum Uptake and Distribution in Single Cells of Chara corallina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.123.3.987
- The paper
- Taylor, G. J., McDonald-Stephens, J. L., Hunter, D. B., Bertsch, P. M., Elmore, D., Rengel, Z., & Reid, R. J. (2000). Direct Measurement of Aluminum Uptake and Distribution in Single Cells of Chara corallina. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.123.3.987
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.