The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Permeability and Channel-Mediated Transport of Boric Acid across Membrane Vesicles Isolated from Squash Roots
Open accessAbstract
Boron is an essential micronutrient for plant growth and the boron content of plants differs greatly, but the mechanism(s) of its uptake into cells is not known. Boron is present in the soil solution as boric acid and it is in this form that it enters the roots. We determined the boron permeability coefficient of purified plasma membrane vesicles obtained from squash (Cucurbita pepo) roots and found it to be 3 × 10−7 ±1.4 × 10−8 cm s−1, six times higher than the permeability of microsomal vesicles. Boric acid permeation of the plasma membrane vesicles was partially inhibited (30%–39%) by mercuric chloride and phloretin, a non-specific channel blocker. The inhibition by mercuric chloride was readily reversible by 2-mercaptoethanol. The energy of activation for boron transport into the plasma membrane vesicles was 10.2 kcal mol−1. Together these data indicate that boron enters plant cells in part by passive diffusion through the lipid bilayer of the plasma membrane and in part through proteinaceous channels. Expression of the major intrinsic protein (MIP) PIP1 in Xenopus laevis oocytes resulted in a 30% increase in the boron permeability of the oocytes. Other MIPs tested (PIP3, MLM1, and GlpF) did not have this effect. We postulate that certain MIPs, like those that have recently been shown to transport small neutral solutes, may also be the channels through which boron enters plant cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Paula, S., Volkov, A. G., Van Hoek, A. N., Haines, T. H., & Deamer, D. W. (1996) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(96)79575-9 · Cited by 578 · cited 1×
“The permeability coefficient for boric acid and urea was determined according to Verkman et al. (1985) and Paula et al. (1996).”
Method
Cited by
Plant Aquaporins: Membrane Channels with Multiple Integrated Functions
Maurel, C., Verdoucq, L., Luu, D.-T., & Santoni, V. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092734 · Cited by 1,280
Plant aquaporins: multifunctional water and solute channels with expanding roles
Tyerman, S. D., Niemietz, C. M., & Bramley, H. (2002) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00791.x · Cited by 638
Chemical root to shoot signaling under drought
Schachtman, D. P., & Goodger, J. Q. D. (2008) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2008.04.003 · Cited by 615
Whole Gene Family Expression and Drought Stress Regulation of Aquaporins
Alexandersson, E., Fraysse, L., Sjövall-Larsen, S., Gustavsson, S., Fellert, M., Karlsson, M., Johanson, U., & Kjellbom, P. (2005) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-005-0352-1 · Cited by 512
Genetic approaches to crop improvement: responding to environmental and population changes
Takeda, S., & Matsuoka, M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2342 · Cited by 461
Metadata
- Authors
- Dordas, C., Chrispeels, M. J., & Brown, P. H.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-11-01
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1349-1362
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2142402338
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Permeability and Channel-Mediated Transport of Boric Acid across Membrane Vesicles Isolated from Squash Roots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.124.3.1349
- The paper
- Dordas, C., Chrispeels, M. J., & Brown, P. H. (2000). Permeability and Channel-Mediated Transport of Boric Acid across Membrane Vesicles Isolated from Squash Roots. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.124.3.1349
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.