The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Seed and Molecular Resources for Arabidopsis
Abstract
Arabidopsis, because of its diminutive size, small genome, and rapid life cycle, has become the premiere research organism in plant biology. The power of Arabidopsis as a model system will become even greater now that all five of its chromosomes have been sequenced. Before 1990, extensive collections of Arabidopsis mutants were maintained by individual scientists, most notably Drs. A. R. Kranz, G. P. Rèdei, and Maarten Koornneef. It is fortunate that it was recognized early on that the establishment of seed stock centers would greatly expedite the dissemination of Arabidopsis research material to the international research community, and thus three major facilities were established. These include the National Science Foundation-supported Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC) in the United States, the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council-supported Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (NASC) in the UK, and Sendai Arabidopsis Seed Stock Center (SASSC) in Japan. The role of a seed stock center is to collect, propagate, preserve, and distribute seed lines which are of use to researchers. Mutant lines are the primary core of a seed collection. Arabidopsis researchers are fortunate to have access, through the stock centers, to approximately 1,000 mutants affecting several hundred separate gene loci. As we enter the post-genomic era this number will be augmented greatly. The mutant lines currently available possess a wide range of interesting characteristics useful to modern biological research. The genes affected by many of these mutations have been cloned and characterized, and there is potential benefit to be derived from the use of appropriate mutants in all areas of plant research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Monoterpenes Support Systemic Acquired Resistance within and between Plants
Riedlmeier, M., Ghirardo, A., Wenig, M., Knappe, C., Koch, K., Georgii, E., Dey, S., Parker, J. E., Schnitzler, J.-P., & Vlot, A. C. (2017) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.16.00898 · Cited by 323
Agrobacterium-Mediated Plant Transformation: Biology and Applications
Hwang, H.-H., Yu, M., & Lai, E.-M. (2017) · The Arabidopsis Book · doi:10.1199/tab.0186 · Cited by 312
Dixon, D. P., Hawkins, T., Hussey, P. J., & Edwards, R. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ern365 · Cited by 301
Phan, H. A., Iacuone, S., Li, S. F., & Parish, R. W. (2011) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.110.082651 · Cited by 293
The Arabidopsis vacuolar malate channel is a member of the ALMT family
Kovermann, P., Meyer, S., Hörtensteiner, S., Picco, C., Scholz‐Starke, J., Ravera, S., Lee, Y., & Martinoia, E. (2007) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03367.x · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Scholl, R. L., May, S. T., & Ware, D. H.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-12-01
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1477-1480
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2069579071
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seed and Molecular Resources for Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.124.4.1477
- The paper
- Scholl, R. L., May, S. T., & Ware, D. H. (2000). Seed and Molecular Resources for Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.124.4.1477
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.