The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genetic Analysis of Seed-Soluble Oligosaccharides in Relation to Seed Storability of Arabidopsis
Open accessAbstract
Seed oligosaccharides (OSs) and especially raffinose series OSs (RSOs) are hypothesized to play an important role in the acquisition of desiccation tolerance and consequently in seed storability. In the present work we analyzed the seed-soluble OS (sucrose, raffinose, and stachyose) content of several Arabidopsis accessions and thus identified the genotype Cape Verde Islands having a very low RSO content. By performing quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping in a recombinant inbred line population, we found one major QTL responsible for the practically monogenic segregation of seed stachyose content. This locus also affected the content of the two other OSs, sucrose, and raffinose. Two candidate genes encoding respectively for galactinol synthase and raffinose synthase were located within the genomic region around this major QTL. In addition, three smaller-effect QTL were identified, each one specifically affecting the content of an individual OS. Seed storability was analyzed in the same recombinant inbred line population by measuring viability (germination) under two different seed aging assays: after natural aging during 4 years of dry storage at room temperature and after artificial aging induced by a controlled deterioration test. Thus, four QTL responsible for the variation of this trait were mapped. Comparison of the QTL genetic positions showed that the genomic region containing the major OS locus did not significantly affect the seed storability. We concluded that in the studied material neither RSOs nor sucrose content had a specific effect on seed storability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metabolomics-assisted breeding: a viable option for crop improvement?
Fernie, A. R., & Schauer, N. (2009) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2008.10.010 · Cited by 550
The genetics of plant metabolism
Keurentjes, J. J. B., Fu, J., de Vos, C. H. R., Lommen, A., Hall, R. D., Bino, R. J., van der Plas, L. H. W., Jansen, R. C., Vreugdenhil, D., & Koornneef, M. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1815 · Cited by 499
Self-citationBentsink, L., & Koornneef, M. (2008) · The Arabidopsis Book · doi:10.1199/tab.0119 · Cited by 422
Self-citationApproaches and challenges to engineering seed phytate and total phosphorus
Raboy, V. (2009) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.06.012 · Cited by 381
Metabolomics for Plant Improvement: Status and Prospects
Kumar, R., Bohra, A., Pandey, A. K., Pandey, M. K., & Kumar, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01302 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Bentsink, L., Alonso-Blanco, C., Vreugdenhil, D., Tesnier, K., Groot, S. P. C., & Koornneef, M.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-12-01
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1595-1604
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2135205330
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic Analysis of Seed-Soluble Oligosaccharides in Relation to Seed Storability of Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.124.4.1595
- The paper
- Bentsink, L., Alonso-Blanco, C., Vreugdenhil, D., Tesnier, K., Groot, S. P. C., & Koornneef, M. (2000). Genetic Analysis of Seed-Soluble Oligosaccharides in Relation to Seed Storability of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.124.4.1595
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.