The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards a Better Understanding of the Genetic and Physiological Basis for Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Maize
Open accessAbstract
To enhance our understanding of the genetic basis of nitrogen use efficiency in maize (Zea mays), we have developed a quantitative genetic approach by associating metabolic functions and agronomic traits to DNA markers. In this study, leaves of vegetative recombinant inbred lines of maize, already assessed for their agronomic performance, were analyzed for physiological traits such as nitrate content, nitrate reductase (NR), and glutamine synthetase (GS) activities. A significant genotypic variation was found for these traits and a positive correlation was observed between nitrate content, GS activity and yield, and its components. NR activity, on the other hand, was negatively correlated. These results suggest that increased productivity in maize genotypes was due to their ability to accumulate nitrate in their leaves during vegetative growth and to efficiently remobilize this stored nitrogen during grain filling. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) for various agronomic and physiological traits were searched for and located on the genetic map of maize. Coincidences of QTL for yield and its components with genes encoding cytosolic GS and the corresponding enzyme activity were detected. In particular, it appears that the GS locus on chromosome 5 is a good candidate gene that can, at least partially, explain variations in yield or kernel weight. Because at this locus coincidences of QTLs for grain yield, GS, NR activity, and nitrate content were also observed, we hypothesize that leaf nitrate accumulation and the reactions catalyzed by NR and GS are coregulated and represent key elements controlling nitrogen use efficiency in maize.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bradford, M. M. (1976) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 · Cited by 255,302
Cited by
Miflin, B. J., & Habash, D. Z. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/53.370.979 · Cited by 746
Quantitative Trait Loci and Crop Performance under Abiotic Stress: Where Do We Stand?: Table I.
Collins, N. C., Tardieu, F., & Tuberosa, R. (2008) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.108.118117 · Cited by 559
Reymond, M., Muller, B., Leonardi, A., Charcosset, A., & Tardieu, F. (2003) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.013839 · Cited by 428
TUBEROSA, R. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf134 · Cited by 397
Cross, J. M., von Korff, M., Altmann, T., Bartzetko, L., Sulpice, R., Gibon, Y., Palacios, N., & Stitt, M. (2006) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.106.086629 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Hirel, B., Bertin, P., Quilleré, I., Bourdoncle, W., Attagnant, C., Dellay, C., Gouy, A., Cadiou, S., Retailliau, C., Falque, M., & Gallais, A.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1258-1270
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2129900179
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards a Better Understanding of the Genetic and Physiological Basis for Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Maize. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.125.3.1258
- The paper
- Hirel, B., Bertin, P., Quilleré, I., Bourdoncle, W., Attagnant, C., Dellay, C., Gouy, A., Cadiou, S., Retailliau, C., Falque, M., & Gallais, A. (2001). Towards a Better Understanding of the Genetic and Physiological Basis for Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Maize. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.125.3.1258
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.