The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chloroplast and Mitochondrial Proteases in Arabidopsis. A Proposed Nomenclature
Open accessAbstract
The identity and scope of chloroplast and mitochondrial proteases in higher plants has only started to become apparent in recent years. Biochemical and molecular studies suggested the existence of Clp, FtsH, and DegP proteases in chloroplasts, and a Lon protease in mitochondria, although currently the full extent of their role in organellar biogenesis and function remains poorly understood. Rapidly accumulating DNA sequence data, especially from Arabidopsis, has revealed that these proteolytic enzymes are found in plant cells in multiple isomeric forms. As a consequence, a systematic approach was taken to catalog all these isomers, to predict their intracellular location and putative processing sites, and to propose a standard nomenclature to avoid confusion and facilitate scientific communication. For the Clp protease most of the ClpP isomers are found in chloroplasts, whereas one is mitochondrial. Of the ATPase subunits, the one ClpD and two ClpC isomers are located in chloroplasts, whereas both ClpX isomers are present in mitochondria. Isomers of the Lon protease are predicted in both compartments, as are the different forms of FtsH protease. DegP, the least characterized protease in plant cells, has the most number of isomers and they are predicted to localize in several cell compartments. These predictions, along with the proposed nomenclature, will serve as a framework for future studies of all four families of proteases and their individual isomers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response
Wang, W., Vinocur, B., Shoseyov, O., & Altman, A. (2004) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2004.03.006 · Cited by 2,759
The evolution of the plastid chromosome in land plants: gene content, gene order, gene function
Wicke, S., Schneeweiss, G. M., dePamphilis, C. W., Müller, K. F., & Quandt, D. (2011) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-011-9762-4 · Cited by 1,624
Peltier, J.-B., Emanuelsson, O., Kalume, D. E., Ytterberg, J., Friso, G., Rudella, A., Liberles, D. A., Söderberg, L., Roepstorff, P., von Heijne, G., et al. (2002) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.010304 · Cited by 451
ROS signalling – specificity is required
Møller, I. M., & Sweetlove, L. J. (2010) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2010.04.008 · Cited by 401
A cut above the rest: the regulatory function of plant proteases
Schaller, A. (2004) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-004-1407-2 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Adam, Z., Adamska, I., Nakabayashi, K., Ostersetzer, O., Haussuhl, K., Manuell, A., Zheng, B., Vallon, O., Rodermel, S. R., Shinozaki, K., & Clarke, A. K.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-04-01
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1912-1918
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2123369982
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chloroplast and Mitochondrial Proteases in Arabidopsis. A Proposed Nomenclature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.125.4.1912
- The paper
- Adam, Z., Adamska, I., Nakabayashi, K., Ostersetzer, O., Haussuhl, K., Manuell, A., Zheng, B., Vallon, O., Rodermel, S. R., Shinozaki, K., & Clarke, A. K. (2001). Chloroplast and Mitochondrial Proteases in Arabidopsis. A Proposed Nomenclature. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.125.4.1912
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.