Cited by 160Plant Molecular Biology ResearchPlant Parasitism and ResistancePlant nutrient uptake and metabolism

Long-Distance Signaling and the Control of Branching in the rms1 Mutant of Pea

Open access
Foo, Eloise, Turnbull, Colin G.N., Beveridge, Christine A.·2001·Plant Physiology

Abstract

The ramosus (rms) mutation (rms1) of pea (Pisum sativum) causes increased branching through modification of graft-transmissible signal(s) produced in rootstock and shoot. Additional grafting techniques have led us to propose that the novel signal regulated byRms1 moves acropetally in shoots and acts as a branching inhibitor. Epicotyl interstock grafts showed that wild-type (WT) epicotyls grafted between rms1 scions and rootstocks can revert mutant scions to a WT non-branching phenotype. Mutant scions grafted together with mutant and WT rootstocks did not branch despite a contiguous mutant root-shoot system. The primary action ofRms1 is, therefore, unlikely to be to block transport of a branching stimulus from root to shoot. Rather, Rms1may influence a long-distance signal that functions, directly or indirectly, as a branching inhibitor. It can be deduced that this signal moves acropetally in shoots because WT rootstocks inhibit branching in rms1 shoots, and although WT scions do not branch when grafted to mutant rootstocks, they do not inhibit branching in rms1 cotyledonary shoots growing from the same rootstocks. The acropetal direction of transport of theRms1 signal supports previous evidence that therms1 lesion is not in an auxin biosynthesis or transport pathway. The different branching phenotypes of WT andrms1 shoots growing from the same rms1rootstock provides further evidence that the shoot has a major role in the regulation of branching and, moreover, that root-exported cytokinin is not the only graft-transmissible signal regulating branching in intact pea plants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.126.1.203

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experiments with mutants lacking axillary meristems in an rms4 background demonstrated that branching per se was not the cause of the feedback.

    “experiments with mutants lacking axillary meristems in an rms4 background demonstrated that branching per se was not the cause of the feedback (Foo et al., 2001(Foo et al., , 2007)).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 160

Authors
Foo, E., Turnbull, C. G. N., & Beveridge, C. A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of London (GB)
Venue
Plant Physiology
Published
2001-05-01
Volume
126
Issue
1
Pages
203-209
ISSN
  • 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2548
OpenAlex
W2129059486
Cited by
160
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 15
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Keywords
pea, Pisum sativum, long-distance signaling, shoot apical meristem, cytokinins, auxin
MeSH terms
Mutation, Plant Proteins, Signal Transduction, Pisum sativum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review