The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nitric Oxide Induces Stomatal Closure and Enhances the Adaptive Plant Responses against Drought Stress
Open accessAbstract
Nitric oxide (NO) is a very active molecule involved in many and diverse biological pathways where it has proved to be protective against damages provoked by oxidative stress conditions. In this work, we studied the effect of two NO donors, sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine SNP-treated on the response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) to water stress conditions. After 2 and 3 h of drought, detached wheat leaves pretreated with 150 microM SNP retained up to 15% more water than those pretreated with water or NO(2)(-)/NO(3)(-). The effect of SNP treatment on water retention was also found in wheat seedlings after 7 d of drought. These results were consistent with a 20% decrease in the transpiration rate of SNP-treated detached wheat leaves for the same analyzed time. In parallel experiments, NO was also able to induce a 35%, 30%, and 65% of stomatal closure in three different species, Tradescantia sp. (monocotyledonous) and two dicotyledonous, Salpichroa organifolia and fava bean (Vicia faba), respectively. In SNP-treated leaves of Tradescantia sp., the stomatal closure was correlated with a 10% increase on RWC. Ion leakage, a cell injury index, was 25% lower in SNP-treated wheat leaves compared with control ones after the recovery period. Carboxy-PTIO (2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide), a specific NO scavenger, reverted SNP action by restoring the transpiration rate, stomatal aperture, and the ion leakage to the level found in untreated leaves. Northern-blot analysis showed that SNP-treated wheat leaves display a 2-fold accumulation of a group three late embryogenesis abundant transcript with respect to control leaves both after 2 and 4 h of drought periods. All together, these results suggest that the exogenous application of NO donors might confer an increased tolerance to severe drought stress conditions in plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nitric oxide signalling in plants
Neill, S. J., Desikan, R., & Hancock, J. T. (2003) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00804.x · Cited by 874
Nitric Oxide Functions as a Signal in Salt Resistance in the Calluses from Two Ecotypes of Reed
Zhao, L., Zhang, F., Guo, J., Yang, Y., Li, B., & Zhang, L. (2004) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.103.030023 · Cited by 435
Maia, L. B., & Moura, J. J. G. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400518y · Cited by 401
Role of nitric oxide in tolerance of plants to abiotic stress
Siddiqui, M. H., Al-Whaibi, M. H., & Basalah, M. O. (2011) · Protoplasma · doi:10.1007/s00709-010-0206-9 · Cited by 351
Nitric oxide is involved in growth regulation and re-orientation of pollen tubes
Prado, A. M., Porterfield, D. M., & Feijó, J. A. (2004) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.01153 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Garcı́a-Mata, C., & Lamattina, L.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-07-01
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1196-1204
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W1927158303
- Cited by
- 766
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitric Oxide Induces Stomatal Closure and Enhances the Adaptive Plant Responses against Drought Stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.126.3.1196
- The paper
- Garcı́a-Mata, C., & Lamattina, L. (2001). Nitric Oxide Induces Stomatal Closure and Enhances the Adaptive Plant Responses against Drought Stress. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.126.3.1196
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.