The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Sugar on Vegetative Development and Floral Transition in Arabidopsis
Open accessAbstract
Although sugar has been suggested to promote floral transition in many plant species, growth on high concentrations (5% [w/v]) of sucrose (Suc) significantly delayed flowering time, causing an increase in the number of leaves at the time of flowering in Arabidopsis. The effect of high concentrations of Suc seemed to be metabolic rather than osmotic. The delay of floral transition was due to extension of the late vegetative phase, which resulted in a delayed activation of LFY expression. In addition, growth on low concentrations (1% [w/v]) of Suc slightly inhibited flowering in wild-type plants. This delay resulted from effects on the early vegetative phase. This inhibition was more pronounced intfl1, an early flowering mutant, than in the wild type. Although 1% (w/v) Suc was reported to promote floral transition of late-flowering mutants such as co,fca, and gi, floral transition in these mutants was delayed by a further increase in Suc concentration. These results suggest that sugar may affect floral transition by activating or inhibiting genes that act to control floral transition, depending on the concentration of sugars, the genetic background of the plants, and when the sugar is introduced. Growth on 1% (w/v) Suc did not restore the reduced expression levels of FT andSOC1/AGL20 in co or fcamutants. Rather, expression of FT andSOC1/AGL20 was repressed by 1% (w/v) Suc in wild-type background. The possible effects of sugar on gene expression to promote floral transition are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
SUGAR SENSING AND SIGNALING IN PLANTS: Conserved and Novel Mechanisms
Rolland, F., Baena-Gonzalez, E., & Sheen, J. (2006) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105441 · Cited by 2,328
Regulation of flowering time: all roads lead to Rome
Srikanth, A., & Schmid, M. (2011) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-011-0673-y · Cited by 1,039
The control of developmental phase transitions in plants
Huijser, P., & Schmid, M. (2011) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.063511 · Cited by 673
MYB transcription factors, active players in abiotic stress signaling
Li, C., Ng, C. K.-Y., & Fan, L.-M. (2015) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.06.014 · Cited by 406
Flowering time and elevated atmospheric CO2
Springer, C. J., & Ward, J. K. (2007) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02196.x · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Ohto, M.-A., Onai, K., Furukawa, Y., Aoki, E., Araki, T., & Nakamura, K.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-09-01
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 252-261
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2160102526
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Sugar on Vegetative Development and Floral Transition in Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.127.1.252
- The paper
- Ohto, M.-A., Onai, K., Furukawa, Y., Aoki, E., Araki, T., & Nakamura, K. (2001). Effects of Sugar on Vegetative Development and Floral Transition in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.127.1.252
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.