Cited by 206Plant Surface Properties and TreatmentsPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsPlant Stress Responses and Tolerance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Localization of the Transpiration Barrier in the Epi- and Intracuticular Waxes of Eight Plant Species: Water Transport Resistances Are Associated with Fatty Acyl Rather Than Alicyclic Components

Open access
Jetter, Reinhard, Riederer, Markus·2016·Plant Physiology

Abstract

Plant cuticular waxes play a crucial role in limiting nonstomatal water loss. The goal of this study was to localize the transpiration barrier within the layered structure of cuticles of eight selected plant species and to put its physiological function into context with the chemical composition of the intracuticular and epicuticular wax layers. Four plant species (Tetrastigma voinierianum, Oreopanax guatemalensis, Monstera deliciosa, and Schefflera elegantissima) contained only very-long-chain fatty acid (VLCFA) derivatives such as alcohols, alkyl esters, aldehydes, and alkanes in their waxes. Even though the epicuticular and intracuticular waxes of these species had very similar compositions, only the intracuticular wax was important for the transpiration barrier. In contrast, four other species (Citrus aurantium, Euonymus japonica, Clusia flava, and Garcinia spicata) had waxes containing VLCFA derivatives, together with high percentages of alicyclic compounds (triterpenoids, steroids, or tocopherols) largely restricted to the intracuticular wax layer. In these species, both the epicuticular and intracuticular waxes contributed equally to the cuticular transpiration barrier. We conclude that the cuticular transpiration barrier is primarily formed by the intracuticular wax but that the epicuticular wax layer may also contribute to it, depending on species-specific cuticle composition. The barrier is associated mainly with VLCFA derivatives and less (if at all) with alicyclic wax constituents. The sealing properties of the epicuticular and intracuticular layers were not correlated with other characteristics, such as the absolute wax amounts and thicknesses of these layers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.15.01699

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jetter, R., & Riederer, M.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Plant Physiology
Published
2015-12-07
Volume
170
Issue
2
Pages
921-934
ISSN
  • 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2548
OpenAlex
W2192138258
Cited by
206
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Keywords
cuticular wax, epicuticular wax, very long chain fatty acids, triterpenoids, cuticle composition, Monstera deliciosa, Citrus aurantium
MeSH terms
Biological Transport, Chromatography, Gas, Fatty Acids, Hydrocarbons, Alicyclic, Polymers, Species Specificity, Water, Waxes, Plant Transpiration, Plant Epidermis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review