Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recent Progress in Understanding the Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Plant Cell Signaling

Open access
Dietz, Karl-Josef, Mittler, Ron, Noctor, Graham·2016·Plant Physiology

Abstract

The significance and often centrality of reactive oxygen species (ROS)- and redox-related signaling are now established for most processes in plant development and acclimation. Each cell possesses a redox regulatory network whose state is adjusted by ROS and virtually controls all processes such as gene expression and translation, metabolism, and turnover. Recent years have witnessed significant advancements in understanding the cross talk between organelles in orchestrating the cellular redox state temporally and spatially. ROS function as oxidants of proteins altering their function and of lipids releasing signal-active compounds. This Focus Issue combines 18 publications that either summarize recent advances in the format of topical Focus Reviews or provide novel insight into ROS-associated processes. Our most detailed knowledge of ROS functions still comes from work with photosynthesizing leaves; therefore, the majority of reports in this special issue focus on leaf processes. Other contributions address ROS-dependent regulation of flower senescence (Rogers and Munné-Bosch, 2016), polar growth of pollen and root hairs (Mangano et al., 2016), and other root processes, including root architecture formation (Evans et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2016). In vivo ROS imaging in cells and tissues has contributed significantly to many of the recent advances in understanding ROS signaling. Historically, 3,3′-diaminobenzidine for H2O2 and nitroblue tetrazolium for O2 •− were used as the main workhorses for in situ imaging. Both dyes provided preliminary indications for ROS accumulation, but in most cases, more sensitive and less invasive probes should be used nowadays. Thus, the majority of studies presented in this Focus Issue employed fluorescein-based probes such as the 1O2 sensory fluorescein anthracene Singlet Oxygen Sensor Green (Koh et al., 2016) or the H2O2 probe OxyBurst Green (2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate; Evans et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2016). These newer probes offer sensitive and more reliable readouts but are difficult to apply to some tissues like leaves, and their specificity is still disputed (Winterbourn, 2014). Genetically encoded sensors such as the ratiometric HyPer and HyPerRed were also used for ROS and redox detection in previous studies (Chiu et al., 2014; Ermakova et al., 2014). A major advantage for future plant ROS research would be to standardize protocols for in vivo cell imaging. Standardization would enable comparing ROS images and measurements between different studies and different labs. ROS are conditionally generated in various subcellular compartments and cellular environments (Fig. 1). The spatial and temporal pattern of ROS in combination with their reaction specificity is exploited for specific sensing and signaling in the cell. Chloroplasts (Dietz et al., 2016; Takagi et al., 2016), mitochondria (Huang et al., 2016), peroxisomes (Kerchev et al., 2016; Rodriguez-Serrano et al., 2016), and plasma membrane-associated NADPH oxidases (Respiratory burst oxidase homologs, RBOH; Gilroy et al., 2016) and the ROS-dependent dynamics of organellar shape are addressed in this Focus Issue. Some of the multiple regulatory roles of ROS in plants addressed in this Focus Issue. Subcellular sites of ROS generation, e.g. in the chloroplast or mitochondrion, determine processes such as gene expression, cellular damage, and cell death. Progress has been made in understanding intracellular ROS transfer; formation of protrusions such as stromules, peroxules, and matrixules; and the ROS network of cells. ROS play a profound role in intercellular and long-distance communication in plants. In addition to their roles in environmental acclimation, ROS are receiving increasing awareness for their function in developmental processes such as the regulation of root architecture, polar growth, and organ senescence. Abbreviations not defined in the text: AOX, alternative oxidase; GO, glycolate oxidase; PTOX, plastid terminal oxidase. Redox interactions between intracellular compartments are key to stress responses and developmental processes. Organelles such as chloroplasts, mitochondria, and peroxisomes are powerful generators of ROS and other redox signals through core processes such as photosynthesis, photorespiration, and respiration. Coordination of gene expression between the three genomes of the plant cell requires monitoring of chloroplast and mitochondrial status, to allow appropriate retrograde signaling to the nucleus (Kleine and Leister, 2016). In this issue, the latest developments in understanding ROS and redox signals originating in chloroplasts and mitochondria are discussed by Dietz et al. (2016) and Huang et al. (2016). An outstanding question is how such signals are transmitted between compartments. This question is discussed by Noctor and Foyer (2016) in light of recent advances such as the identification of chloroplast envelope ascorbate transporters (Miyaji et al., 2015) and

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.16.00938

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Dietz, K.-J., Mittler, R., & Noctor, G.
Venue
Plant Physiology
Published
2016-07-01
Volume
171
Issue
3
Pages
1535-1539
ISSN
  • 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2548
OpenAlex
W2465307183
Cited by
257
References
43
FWCI
30.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent Progress in Understanding the Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Plant Cell Signaling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.16.00938
The paper
Dietz, K.-J., Mittler, R., & Noctor, G. (2016). Recent Progress in Understanding the Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Plant Cell Signaling. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.00938

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.