Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,276

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Acetylene-Ethylene Assay for N2 Fixation: Laboratory and Field Evaluation

Open access
Hardy, R. W. F., Holsten, R. D., Jackson, E. K., Burns, R. C.·1968·Plant Physiology

Abstract

The methodology, characteristics and application of the sensitive C(2)H(2)-C(2)H(4) assay for N(2) fixation by nitrogenase preparations and bacterial cultures in the laboratory and by legumes and free-living bacteria in situ is presented in this comprehensive report. This assay is based on the N(2)ase-catalyzed reduction of C(2)H(2) to C(2)H(4), gas chromatographic isolation of C(2)H(2) and C(2)H(4), and quantitative measurement with a H(2)-flame analyzer. As little as 1 mumumole C(2)H(4) can be detected, providing a sensitivity 10(3)-fold greater than is possible with (15)N analysis.A simple, rapid and effective procedure utilizing syringe-type assay chambers is described for the analysis of C(2)H(2)-reducing activity in the field. Applications to field samples included an evaluation of N(2) fixation by commercially grown soybeans based on over 2000 analyses made during the course of the growing season. Assay values reflected the degree of nodulation of soybean plants and indicated a calculated seasonal N(2) fixation rate of 30 to 33 kg N(2) fixed per acre, in good agreement with literature estimates based on Kjeldahl analyses. The assay was successfully applied to measurements of N(2) fixation by other symbionts and by free living soil microorganisms, and was also used to assess the effects of light and temperature on the N(2) fixing activity of soybeans. The validity of measuring N(2) fixation in terms of C(2)H(2) reduction was established through extensive comparisons of these activities using defined systems, including purified N(2)ase preparations and pure cultures of N(2)-fixing bacteria.With this assay it now becomes possible and practicable to conduct comprehensive surveys of N(2) fixation, to make detailed comparisons among different N(2)-fixing symbionts, and to rapidly evaluate the effects of cultural practices and environmental factors on N(2) fixation. The knowledge obtained through extensive application of this assay should provide the basis for efforts leading to the maximum agricultural exploitation of the N(2) fixation reaction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.43.8.1185

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,276

Metadata

Authors
Hardy, R. W. F., Holsten, R. D., Jackson, E. K., & Burns, R. C.
Venue
Plant Physiology
Published
1968-08-01
Volume
43
Issue
8
Pages
1185-1207
ISSN
  • 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2548
OpenAlex
W2072883743
Cited by
2,276
References
0
FWCI
49.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Acetylene-Ethylene Assay for N2 Fixation: Laboratory and Field Evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.43.8.1185
The paper
Hardy, R. W. F., Holsten, R. D., Jackson, E. K., & Burns, R. C. (1968). The Acetylene-Ethylene Assay for N2 Fixation: Laboratory and Field Evaluation. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.43.8.1185

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.