The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High photosynthetic rate of a chlorophyll mutant of cotton.
Open accessAbstract
In a chlorophyll mutant (virescent) and wild-type cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), a number of photosynthetic parameters have been measured and compared with those published for other chlorophyll mutants. (a) The photosynthetic rates at 230 w/m(2) (400-700 nm) from a tungsten lamp were 36.8 mg CO(2) fixed/dm(2).hr (virescent) and 39.5 mg CO(2) fixed/dm(2).hr (wild-type). On a chlorphyll basis, the photosynthetic rates were 36.8 and 12.1 mg CO(2) fixed/mg chl.hr, respectively. (b) The photosynthetic rates at 13 w/m(2) (400-700 nm) from a tungsten source were 7.1 mg CO(2) fixed/dm(2).hr (virescent) and 7.4 mg CO(2) fixed/dm(2).hr (wild-type). On a chlorophyll basis, the photosynthetic rates were 6.0 and 1.4 mg CO(2) fixed/mg chl.hr, respectively. (c) The chlorophyll a/b ratios of the virescent and wild-type leaves were 3.3 and 4.1 (d) The chlorophyll/carotenoid ratios for the virescent and wild-type leaves were 3.2 and 7.3, respectively. (e) The photosynthetic carbon metabolism of the chlorophyll mutant was through the reductive pentose phosphate cycle. (f) The CO(2) compensation points for the virescent and wild-type plants were similar. (g) The mutant and wild-type leaves have the same quantum yield in the red part of the visible spectrum, but the virescent leaves have a lower quantum yield in the blue part of the spectrum. (h) Virescent and wild-type leaves contain similar levels on a protein basis of several reductive pentose phosphate cycle enzymes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Experimental evidence supporting the principle of this notion has been found in similar or greater rates of Aleaf in various crops with substantial reductions in chl compared to their dark-green counterparts (Highkin et al., 1969; Benedict et al., 1972; Edwards et al., 1993; Habash et al., 1994; Li et al., 2013; Kirst et al., 2017).”
From Photosynthesis, Light Use Efficiency, and Yield of Reduced-Chlorophyll Soybean Mutants in Field Conditions (2017) · cites this paper as Benedict et al., 1972
Citations
Cites
The action spectrum, absorptance and quantum yield of photosynthesis in crop plants
McCree, K. J. (1971) · Agricultural Meteorology · doi:10.1016/0002-1571(71)90022-7 · Cited by 1,278
Self-citation
Cited by
Slattery, R. A., VanLoocke, A., Bernacchi, C. J., Zhu, X.-G., & Ort, D. R. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00549 · Cited by 153
“…principle of this notion has been found in similar or greater rates of Aleaf in various crops with substantial reductions in chl compared to their dark-green counterparts (Highkin et al., 1969; Benedict et al., 1972; Edwards et al., 1993; Habash et al., 1994; Li et al., 2013; Kirst et al., 2017).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Benedict, C. R., McCree, K. J., & Kohel, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1972-06-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 968-971
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- PMC
- PMC366089
- OpenAlex
- W2027155826
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Agricultural Research Service
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Research in Cotton Cultivation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
- Keywords
- chlorophyll mutants, cotton, Gossypium hirsutum, photosynthetic rate, CO2 fixation, chlorophyll a/b ratio, Calvin cycle, photosynthetic carbon metabolism, quantum yield, CO2 compensation point
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review