The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Root Nodule Enzymes of Ammonia Assimilation in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.): DEVELOPMENTAL PATTERNS AND RESPONSE TO APPLIED NITROGEN
Open accessAbstract
Nitrogenase-dependent acetylene reduction activity of glasshouse-grown alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) decreased rapidly in response both to harvesting (80% shoot removal) and applied NO(3) (-) at 40 and 80 kilograms N per hectare. Acetylene reduction activity of harvested plants grown on 0 kilogram N per hectare began to recover by day 15 as shoot regrowth became significant. In contrast, acetylene reduction activity of all plants treated with 80 kilograms NO(3) (-)-N per hectare and harvested plants treated with 40 kilograms NO(3) (-)-N per hectare remained low for the duration of the experiment. Acetylene reduction of unharvested alfalfa treated with 40 kilograms N per hectare declined to an intermediate level and appeared to recover slightly by day 15. Changes in N(2)-fixing capacity were accompanied by similar changes in levels of nodule soluble protein.After an initial lag of 24 hours, specific activities of alfalfa nodule glutamine synthetase, NADH-glutamate synthase, and NAD-glutamate dehydrogenase (oxidative amination) decreased similar to but less rapidly than acetylene reduction activity. Increased specific activities of these nodule enzymes occurred as acetylene reduction activity increased and shoot growth resumed. The observed rates of glutamine synthetase and glutamate synthase were sufficient to assimilate ammonia produced via symbiotic N(2) fixation. Nodule NADH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase (reductive amination) specific activity was not associated with changes in acetylene reduction activity.The data indicate that host plant glutamine synthetase and NADH-glutamate synthase function to assimilate symbiotically fixed N and that NADH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase may function in ammonia assimilation during senescence in alfalfa nodules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rocha, M., Licausi, F., Araújo, W. L., Nunes-Nesi, A., Sodek, L., Fernie, A. R., & van Dongen, J. T. (2010) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.109.150045 · Cited by 414
Feng, J., Shi, Q., Wang, X., Wei, M., Yang, F., & Xu, H. (2010) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2009.10.013 · Cited by 323
Xu, Z., Lei, P., Feng, X., Xu, X., Liang, J., Chi, B., & Xu, H. (2014) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.03.036 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Groat, R. G., & Vance, C. P.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1981-06-01
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1198-1203
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2092851282
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Root Nodule Enzymes of Ammonia Assimilation in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.): DEVELOPMENTAL PATTERNS AND RESPONSE TO APPLIED NITROGEN. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.67.6.1198
- The paper
- Groat, R. G., & Vance, C. P. (1981). Root Nodule Enzymes of Ammonia Assimilation in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.): DEVELOPMENTAL PATTERNS AND RESPONSE TO APPLIED NITROGEN. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.67.6.1198
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.