The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chilling-Enhanced Photooxidation: Evidence for the Role of Singlet Oxygen and Superoxide in the Breakdown of Pigments and Endogenous Antioxidants
Open accessAbstract
Chilling temperatures (5 degrees C) and high irradiance (1000 microeinsteins per square meter per second) were used to induce photooxidation in detached leaves of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.), a chilling-sensitive plant. Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, beta carotene, and three xanthophylls were degraded in a light-dependent fashion at essentially the same rate. Lipid peroxidation (measured as ethane evolution) showed an O(2) dependency. The levels of three endogenous antioxidants, ascorbate, reduced glutathione, and alpha tocopherol, all showed an irradiance-dependent decline. alpha-Tocopherol was the first antioxidant affected and appeared to be the only antioxidant that could be implicated in long-term protection of the photosynthetic pigments. Results from the application of antioxidants having relative selectivity for (1)O(2), O(2) (-), or OH indicated that both (1)O(2) and O(2) (-) were involved in the chilling- and light-induced lipid peroxidation which accompanied photooxidation. Application of D(2)O (which enhances the lifetime of (1)O(2)) corroborated these results. Chilling under high light produced no evidence of photooxidative damage in detached leaves of chilling-resistant pea (Pisum sativum L.). Our results suggest a fundamental difference in the ability of pea to reduce the destructive effects of free-radical and (1)O(2) production in chloroplasts during chilling in high light.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foyer, C. H., & Halliwell, B. (1976) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386001 · Cited by 2,629
Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis Induced by Visible Light
Powles, S. B. (1984) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.35.060184.000311 · Cited by 1,841
Halliwell, B., & Foyer, C. H. (1978) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00390803 · Cited by 453
Carotenoid protection against oxidation
Krinsky, N. I. (1979) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac197951030649 · Cited by 418
Harbour, J. R., & Bolton, J. R. (1978) · Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1978.tb07700.x · Cited by 101
Cited by
Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants
Gill, S. S., & Tuteja, N. (2010) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016 · Cited by 11,663
Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review
Parida, A. K., & Das, A. B. (2005) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.06.010 · Cited by 4,160
Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants
Ashraf, M., & Harris, P. J. C. (2004) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.10.024 · Cited by 2,044
Foyer, C. H., Lopez-Delgado, H., Dat, J. F., & Scott, I. M. (1997) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.1997.1000205.x · Cited by 1,303
Biotechnological approach of improving plant salt tolerance using antioxidants as markers
Ashraf, M. (2009) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.003 · Cited by 1,137
Metadata
- Authors
- Wise, R. R., & Naylor, A. W.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987-02-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 278-282
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2023778946
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 12.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.