Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structure of Plant Cell Walls: XIX. Isolation and Characterization of Wall Polysaccharides from Suspension-Cultured Douglas Fir Cells

Open access
Thomas, Jerry R., McNeil, Michael, Darvill, Alan G., Albersheim, Peter·1987·Plant Physiology

Abstract

The partial purification and characterization of cell wall polysaccharides isolated from suspension-cultured Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) cells are described. Extraction of isolated cell walls with 1.0 m LiCl solubilized pectic polysaccharides with glycosyl-linkage compositions similar to those of rhamnogalacturonans I and II, pectic polysaccharides isolated from walls of suspension-cultured sycamore cells. Treatment of LiCl-extracted Douglas fir walls with an endo-alpha-1,4-polygalacturonase released only small, additional amounts of pectic polysaccharide, which had a glycosyl-linkage composition similar to that of rhamnogalacturonan I. Xyloglucan oligosaccharides were released from the endo-alpha-1,4-polygalacturonase-treated walls by treatment with an endo-beta-1,4-glucanase. These oligosaccharides included hepta- and nonasaccharides similar or identical to those released from sycamore cell walls by the same enzyme, and structurally related octa- and decasaccharides similar to those isolated from various angiosperms. Finally, additional xyloglucan and small amounts of xylan were extracted from the endo-beta-1,4-glucanase-treated walls by 0.5 n NaOH. The xylan resembled that extracted by NaOH from dicot cell walls in that it contained 2,4- but not 3,4-linked xylosyl residues. In this study, a total of 15% of the cell wall was isolated as pectic material, 10% as xyloglucan, and less than 1% as xylan. The noncellulosic polysaccharides accounted for 26% of the cell walls, cellulose for 23%, protein for 34%, and ash for 5%, for a total of 88% of the cell wall. The cell walls of Douglas fir were more similar to dicot (sycamore) cell walls than to those of graminaceous monocots, because they had a predominance of xyloglucan over xylan as the principle hemicellulose and because they possessed relatively large amounts of rhamnogalacturonan-like pectic polysaccharides.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.83.3.659

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 238

Metadata

Authors
Thomas, J. R., McNeil, M., Darvill, A. G., & Albersheim, P.
Venue
Plant Physiology
Published
1987-03-01
Volume
83
Issue
3
Pages
659-671
ISSN
  • 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2548
OpenAlex
W2022402477
Cited by
238
References
2
FWCI
12.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure of Plant Cell Walls: XIX. Isolation and Characterization of Wall Polysaccharides from Suspension-Cultured Douglas Fir Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.83.3.659
The paper
Thomas, J. R., McNeil, M., Darvill, A. G., & Albersheim, P. (1987). Structure of Plant Cell Walls: XIX. Isolation and Characterization of Wall Polysaccharides from Suspension-Cultured Douglas Fir Cells. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.83.3.659

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.