The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon and Nitrogen Economy of 24 Wild Species Differing in Relative Growth Rate
Open accessAbstract
The relation between interspecific variation in relative growth rate and carbon and nitrogen economy was investigated. Twentyfour wild species were grown in a growth chamber with a nonlimiting nutrient supply and growth, whole plant photosynthesis, shoot respiration, and root respiration were determined. No correlation was found between the relative growth rate of these species and their rate of photosynthesis expressed on a leaf area basis. There was a positive correlation, however, with the rate of photosynthesis expressed per unit leaf dry weight. Also the rates of shoot and root respiration per unit dry weight correlated positively with relative growth rate. Due to a higher ratio between leaf area and plant weight (leaf area ratio) fast growing species were able to fix relatively more carbon per unit plant weight and used proportionally less of the total amount of assimilates in respiration. Fast growing species had a higher total organic nitrogen concentration per unit plant weight, allocated more nitrogen to the leaves and had a higher photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency, i.e. a higher rate of photosynthesis per unit organic nitrogen in the leaves. Consequently, their nitrogen productivity, the growth rate per unit organic nitrogen in the plant and per day, was higher compared with that of slow growing species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crop Productivity and Photoassimilate Partitioning
Gifford, R. M., Thorne, J. H., Hitz, W. D., & Giaquinta, R. T. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.225.4664.801 · Cited by 447
Cited by
Leaf Life‐Span in Relation to Leaf, Plant, and Stand Characteristics among Diverse Ecosystems
Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B., & Ellsworth, D. S. (1992) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937116 · Cited by 1,646
Thermal acclimation and the dynamic response of plant respiration to temperature
Atkin, O. K., & Tjoelker, M. G. (2003) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(03)00136-5 · Cited by 1,304
Physiological and structural tradeoffs underlying the leaf economics spectrum
Onoda, Y., Wright, I. J., Evans, J. R., Hikosaka, K., Kitajima, K., Niinemets, Ü., Poorter, H., Tosens, T., & Westoby, M. (2017) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14496 · Cited by 722
Self-citationFreschet, G. T., Pagès, L., Iversen, C. M., Comas, L. H., Rewald, B., Roumet, C., Klimešová, J., Zadworny, M., Poorter, H., Postma, J. A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17572 · Cited by 668
Self-citationPhotosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency of species that differ inherently in specific leaf area
Poorter, H., & Evans, J. R. (1998) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420050560 · Cited by 587
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Poorter, H., Remkes, C., & Lambers, H.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-10-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 621-627
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2137947718
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon and Nitrogen Economy of 24 Wild Species Differing in Relative Growth Rate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.94.2.621
- The paper
- Poorter, H., Remkes, C., & Lambers, H. (1990). Carbon and Nitrogen Economy of 24 Wild Species Differing in Relative Growth Rate. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.94.2.621
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.