The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of Five Abscisic Acid-Responsive cDNA Clones Isolated from the Desiccation-Tolerant Plant Craterostigma plantagineum and Their Relationship to Other Water-Stress Genes
Open accessAbstract
Leaves of resurrection plants tolerate desiccation as do embryos of many higher plants. From the resurrection plant Craterostigma plantagineum a number of desiccation-related transcripts have recently been cloned; they are abundantly expressed in dried leaves and abscisic acid-treated dried callus (D Bartels, K Schneider, G Terstappen, D Piatkowski, F Salamini [1990] Planta 18: 27-34). Five distinct cDNA clones representing low copy number genes were selected for further characterization. Their nucleotide sequences were determined and proteins were predicted with a molecular mass between 16 and 34 kilodaltons. Three of these proteins have unusual amino acid compositions and extreme hydrophilic characters. Two of them contain a cluster of contiguous serine residues and lysine-rich repeats. These sequence motifs display homologies to desiccation-related genes expressed in embryos or dehydrated seedlings of several plants. A third cDNA clone contains tracts of sequences which are related to a cotton Lea (late embryogenesis abundant) gene (JC Baker, C Steele, L Dure III [1988] Plant Mol Biol II: 277-291). Secondary structure predictions are discussed and suggest that the deduced proteins could play a role in protecting core cell structures in a dehydrated cell. It is concluded that at least in part the gene products involved in the desiccation-induced pathways are common to leaves of resurrection plants and embryos. Two cDNA clones appear to code for Craterostigma-specific mRNAs. The expression patterns of all five transcripts were studied in comparison to desiccated leaves in dehydrated roots, in wound-stressed leaves and in salt-stressed callus. The data obtained point to the possibility that not only specificity of induction but also the expression level of specific gene products may be of importance for osmoprotection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved tools for biological sequence comparison.
Pearson, W. R., & Lipman, D. J. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444 · Cited by 11,227
Cited by
LEA (Late Embryogenesis Abundant) proteins and their encoding genes in Arabidopsis thaliana
Hundertmark, M., & Hincha, D. K. (2008) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-118 · Cited by 1,044
The evolution of vegetative desiccation tolerance in land plants
Oliver, M. J., Tuba, Z., & Mishler, B. D. (2000) · Plant Ecology · doi:10.1023/a:1026550808557 · Cited by 489
Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (1993) · Molecular and General Genetics MGG · doi:10.1007/bf00279525 · Cited by 381
Moons, A., Bauw, G., Prinsen, E., Van Montagu, M., & Van Der Straeten, D. (1995) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.107.1.177 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Piatkowski, D., Schneider, K., Salamini, F., & Bartels, D.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-12-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1682-1688
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W1994974055
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 30.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of Five Abscisic Acid-Responsive cDNA Clones Isolated from the Desiccation-Tolerant Plant Craterostigma plantagineum and Their Relationship to Other Water-Stress Genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.94.4.1682
- The paper
- Piatkowski, D., Schneider, K., Salamini, F., & Bartels, D. (1990). Characterization of Five Abscisic Acid-Responsive cDNA Clones Isolated from the Desiccation-Tolerant Plant Craterostigma plantagineum and Their Relationship to Other Water-Stress Genes. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.94.4.1682
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.