The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Salinity on Stomatal Conductance, Photosynthetic Capacity, and Carbon Isotope Discrimination of Salt-Tolerant (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and Salt-Sensitive (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) C3 Non-Halophytes
Open accessAbstract
The effects of salinity on growth, stomatal conductance, photosynthetic capacity, and carbon isotope discrimination (Delta) of Gossypium hirsutum L. and Phaseolus vulgaris L. were evaluated. Plants were grown at different NaCl concentrations from 10 days old until mature reproductive structures were formed. Plant growth and leaf area development were strongly reduced by salinity, in both cotton and bean. Stomatal conductance also was reduced by salinity. The Delta always declined with increasing external salinity concentration, indicating that stomatal limitation of photosynthesis was increased. In cotton plant dry matter, Delta correlated with the ratio of intercellular to atmospheric CO(2) partial pressures (p(l)/p(a)) calculated by gas exchange. This correlation was not clear in bean plants, although Delta showed a more pronounced salt induced decline in bean than in cotton. Possible effects of heterogeneity of stomatal aperture and consequent overestimation of p(l) as determined from gas exchange could explain these results. Significant differences of Delta between leaf and seed material were observed in cotton and bean. This suggests different patterns of carbon allocation between leaves and seeds. The photon yield of O(2) evolution determined at rate-limiting photosynthetic photon flux density was insensitive to salinity in both species analyzed. The light- and CO(2)-saturated rate of CO(2) uptake and O(2) evolution showed a salt induced decline in both species. Possible explanations of this observation are discussed. O(2) hypersensitivity was observed in salt stressed cotton plants. These results clearly demonstrate that the effect of salinity on assimilation rate was mostly due to the reduction of stomatal conductance, and that calculation of p(l) may be overestimated in salt stressed plants, because of heterogeneity of stomatal aperture over the leaf surface.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell.
Chaves, M. M., Flexas, J., & Pinheiro, C. (2009) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcn125 · Cited by 4,181
Hernández, J. A., Jiménez, A., Mullineaux, P., & Sevilia, F. (2000) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00602.x · Cited by 837
Loggini, B., Scartazza, A., Brugnoli, E., & Navari-Izzo, F. (1999) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.119.3.1091 · Cited by 573
Self-citationBadeck, F., Tcherkez, G., Nogués, S., Piel, C., & Ghashghaie, J. (2005) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.1912 · Cited by 473
Li, H., Chang, J., Chen, H., Wang, Z., Gu, X., Wei, C., Zhang, Y., Ma, J., Yang, J., & Zhang, X. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00295 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Brugnoli, E., & Lauteri, M.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-02-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 628-635
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W1997937052
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Salinity on Stomatal Conductance, Photosynthetic Capacity, and Carbon Isotope Discrimination of Salt-Tolerant (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and Salt-Sensitive (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) C3 Non-Halophytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.95.2.628
- The paper
- Brugnoli, E., & Lauteri, M. (1991). Effects of Salinity on Stomatal Conductance, Photosynthetic Capacity, and Carbon Isotope Discrimination of Salt-Tolerant (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and Salt-Sensitive (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) C3 Non-Halophytes. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.95.2.628
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.