The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mutants of Arabidopsis with Altered Regulation of Starch Degradation
Open accessAbstract
Mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. with altered regulation of starch degradation were identified by screening for plants that retained high levels of leaf starch after a period of extended darkness. The mutant phenotype was also expressed in seeds, flowers, and roots, indicating that the same pathway of starch degradation is used in these tissues. In many respects, the physiological consequences of the mutations were equivalent to the effects observed in previously characterized mutants of Arabidopsis that are unable to synthesize starch. One mutant line, which was characterized in detail, had normal levels of activity of the starch degradative enzymes alpha-amylase, beta-amylase, phosphorylase, D-enzyme, and debranching enzyme. Thus, it was not possible to establish a biochemical basis for the phenotype, which was due to a recessive mutation at a locus designated sex1 at position 12.2 on chromosome 1. This raises the possibility that hitherto unidentified factors, altered by the mutation, play a key role in regulating or catalyzing starch degradation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Genetic Engineering of Algae for Enhanced Biofuel Production
Radakovits, R., Jinkerson, R. E., Darzins, A., & Posewitz, M. C. (2010) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.00364-09 · Cited by 1,142
Starch: its metabolism, evolution, and biotechnological modification in plants
Zeeman, S. C., Kossmann, J., & Smith, A. M. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112301 · Cited by 1,095
Regulation of flowering time: all roads lead to Rome
Srikanth, A., & Schmid, M. (2011) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-011-0673-y · Cited by 1,039
Muller, B., Pantin, F., Génard, M., Turc, O., Freixes, S., Piques, M., & Gibon, Y. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erq438 · Cited by 846
GENETIC CONTROL OF FLOWERING TIME IN ARABIDOPSIS
Koornneef, M., Alonso-Blanco, C., Peeters, A. J. M., & Soppe, W. (1998) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.345 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Caspar, T., Lin, T.-P., Kakefuda, G., Benbow, L., Preiss, J., & Somerville, C.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-04-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1181-1188
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2056183961
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutants of Arabidopsis with Altered Regulation of Starch Degradation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.95.4.1181
- The paper
- Caspar, T., Lin, T.-P., Kakefuda, G., Benbow, L., Preiss, J., & Somerville, C. (1991). Mutants of Arabidopsis with Altered Regulation of Starch Degradation. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.95.4.1181
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.