The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Primary Structure of Sweet Potato Starch Phosphorylase Deduced from its cDNA Sequence
Open accessAbstract
Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) starch phosphorylase cDNA clones were isolated by screening an expression library prepared from the young root poly(A)(+) RNA successively with an antiserum, a monoclonal antibody, and a specific oligonucleotide probe. One cDNA clone had 3292 nucleotide residues in which was contained an open reading frame coding for 955 amino acids. This sequence was compared with those of potato (916 residues plus 50-residue putative transit peptide) and rabbit muscle (841 residues) phosphorylases. The sweet potato phosphorylase has an overall structural feature highly homologous to that reported for potato phosphorylase, in conformity with the finding that they belong to the same class of plant phosphorylase. High divergencies of the two enzymes are found in the about 70 residue N-termini each including a putative transit peptide, and the midchain 78 residue insert typical of type I plant phosphorylase. We consider that the very high dissimilarity found in the midchain inserts is related to the difference in proteolytic lability of the two plant phosphorylases. Some structural features of the cDNA clone were also discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In sweet potato, the key enzymes involved in starch biosynthesis, including ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase, EC 2.7.7.27), granule-bound starch synthases (GBSS, EC 2.4.1.21), isoamylase (ISA, EC 3.2.1.68), starch-branching enzyme (SBE, EC 2.4.1.18), starch phosphorylase (SP, EC 2.4.1.1), and soluble starch synthase (SSS, EC 2.4.1.21), and their associated genes have been isolated and studied”
From Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Critical Function of Sucrose Metabolism Related-Enzymes in Starch Accumulation in the Storage Root of Sweet Potato (2017) · cites this paper as Lin et al., 1991
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sonnewald, U., Basner, A., Greve, B., et al. (1995) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00019322 · Cited by 94
Zhang, K., Wu, Z., Tang, D., Luo, K., Lu, H., Liu, Y., Dong, J., Wang, X., Lv, C., Wang, J., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00914 · Cited by 88
“…starch phosphorylase (SP, EC 2.4.1.1), and soluble starch synthase (SSS, EC 2.4.1.21), and their associated genes have been isolated and studied (Lin et al., 1991; Bae and Liu, 1997; Harn et al., 2000; Lee et al., 2000; Kim et al., 2005; Hamada et al., 2006; Ahn et al., 2010; Takahata et al.,…”
BackgroundInfluentialMcCool, B. A., Plonk, S. G., Martin, P., et al. (1993) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)54089-8 · Cited by 81
Identification of the Maize Amyloplast Stromal 112-kD Protein as a Plastidic Starch Phosphorylase,
Yu, Y., Mu, H. H., Wasserman, B. P., et al. (2001) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.125.1.351 · Cited by 70
“The three peptides of the 112-kD protein also aligned closely with sequences from the plastidic SP enzymes from potato leaf (Sonnewald et al., 1995), sweet potato (Lin et al., 1991), and spinach leaf (Duwenig et al., 1997a).”
BackgroundChen, H., Chang, S., Wu, C., et al. (2002) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1140402.x · Cited by 58
“Lin et al. (1991) deduced the primary structure of sweet potato L-SP from its cDNA sequence.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, C.-T., Yeh, K.-W., Lee, P.-D., & Su, J.-C.
- Affiliations
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- ORCID
- Yeh, Kai-Wun
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-04-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1250-1253
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- PMC
- PMC1077680
- OpenAlex
- W2034151874
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Keywords
- Ipomoea batatas, cDNA sequence, primary structure, amino acid sequence homology, potato phosphorylase, transit peptide, monoclonal antibody screening, oligonucleotide probes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review