The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Growth Enhancement and Developmental Modifications of in Vitro Grown Potato (Solanum tuberosum spp. tuberosum) as Affected by a Nonfluorescent Pseudomonas sp.
Open accessAbstract
A plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, designated Ps JN and isolated from onion roots, was identified as a nonfluorescent Pseudomonas sp. The percentage of similarity of Ps JN to P. gladioli (NCPPB 1891), P. cichorii (NCPPB 943), and P. viridiflava (NCPPB 635), as determined from 135 biochemical and physiological tests was 77, 70, and 66%, respectively. Ps JN persisted through successive generations of in vitro cultured potato plantlets, both as endophytic and epiphytic populations. In vitro inoculated potato (Solanum tuberosum) nodal explants produced plantlets with significant increases in root number (24-196%), root dry weight (44-201%), haulm dry weight (14-151%), and stem length (26-28%) as compared with noninoculated control plants. Bacterization also enhanced leaf hair formation (55-110%), secondary root branching, and total plant lignin content (43%). Other root colonizing bacteria or heat-killed cells of Ps JN had no significant effect on plant growth. Detached leaves from in vitro grown control plants, when exposed to 19 degrees C and 50% relative humidity, lost 55% of their moisture content in 2.5 hours. Moisture loss by leaves of in vitro grown, bacterized plants, as well as greenhouse-acclimated, bacterized plants, and control plants, was less than 20%. Changes in stomatal closure appear to account for this difference.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers
Vessey, J. K. (2003) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1026037216893 · Cited by 3,224
The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria
Glick, B. R. (1995) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/m95-015 · Cited by 2,649
Applications of free living plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
Lucy, M., Reed, E., & Glick, B. R. (2004) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1023/b:anto.0000024903.10757.6e · Cited by 988
Endophytic Bacteria and Their Potential Applications
Lodewyckx, C., Vangronsveld, J., Porteous, F., Moore, E. R. B., Taghavi, S., Mezgeay, M., & der Lelie, D. V. (2002) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/0735-260291044377 · Cited by 758
Diversity and occurrence of Burkholderia spp. in the natural environment
Compant, S., Nowak, J., Coenye, T., Clément, C., & Ait Barka, E. (2008) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00113.x · Cited by 472
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Frommel, M. I., Nowak, J., & Lazarovits, G.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-07-01
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 928-936
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W1992328858
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growth Enhancement and Developmental Modifications of in Vitro Grown Potato (Solanum tuberosum spp. tuberosum) as Affected by a Nonfluorescent Pseudomonas sp. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.96.3.928
- The paper
- Frommel, M. I., Nowak, J., & Lazarovits, G. (1991). Growth Enhancement and Developmental Modifications of in Vitro Grown Potato (Solanum tuberosum spp. tuberosum) as Affected by a Nonfluorescent Pseudomonas sp. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.96.3.928
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.