The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimation of Mesophyll Conductance to CO2 Flux by Three Different Methods
Open accessAbstract
The resistance to diffusion of CO(2) from the intercellular airspaces within the leaf through the mesophyll to the sites of carboxylation during photosynthesis was measured using three different techniques. The three techniques include a method based on discrimination against the heavy stable isotope of carbon, (13)C, and two modeling methods. The methods rely upon different assumptions, but the estimates of mesophyll conductance were similar with all three methods. The mesophyll conductance of leaves from a number of species was about 1.4 times the stomatal conductance for CO(2) diffusion determined in unstressed plants at high light. The relatively low CO(2) partial pressure inside chloroplasts of plants with a low mesophyll conductance did not lead to enhanced O(2) sensitivity of photosynthesis because the low conductance caused a significant drop in the chloroplast CO(2) partial pressure upon switching to low O(2). We found no correlation between mesophyll conductance and the ratio of internal leaf area to leaf surface area and only a weak correlation between mesophyll conductance and the proportion of leaf volume occupied by air. Mesophyll conductance was independent of CO(2) and O(2) partial pressure during the measurement, indicating that a true physical parameter, independent of biochemical effects, was being measured. No evidence for CO(2)-accumulating mechanisms was found. Some plants, notably Citrus aurantium and Simmondsia chinensis, had very low conductances that limit the rate of photosynthesis these plants can attain at atmospheric CO(2) level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell.
Chaves, M. M., Flexas, J., & Pinheiro, C. (2009) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcn125 · Cited by 4,181
Diffusive and Metabolic Limitations to Photosynthesis under Drought and Salinity in C 3 Plants
Flexas, J., Bota, J., Loreto, F., Cornic, G., & Sharkey, T. D. (2004) · Plant Biology · doi:10.1055/s-2004-820867 · Cited by 1,467
Self-citationImproved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis
Bernacchi, C. J., Singsaas, E. L., Pimentel, C., Portis Jr, A. R., & Long, S. P. (2001) · Plant, Cell and Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00668.x · Cited by 1,304
Long, S. P. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erg262 · Cited by 1,252
Frequently asked questions about in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence: practical issues
Kalaji, H. M., Schansker, G., Ladle, R. J., Goltsev, V., Bosa, K., Allakhverdiev, S. I., Brestic, M., Bussotti, F., Calatayud, A., Dąbrowski, P., et al. (2014) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/s11120-014-0024-6 · Cited by 832
Metadata
- Authors
- Loreto, F., Harley, P. C., Di Marco, G., & Sharkey, T. D.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-04-01
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1437-1443
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W1969636419
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of Mesophyll Conductance to CO2 Flux by Three Different Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.98.4.1437
- The paper
- Loreto, F., Harley, P. C., Di Marco, G., & Sharkey, T. D. (1992). Estimation of Mesophyll Conductance to CO2 Flux by Three Different Methods. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.98.4.1437
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.