The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Studies of the Uptake of Nitrate in Barley: IV. Electrophysiology
Open accessAbstract
Transmembrane electrical potential differences (Deltapsi) of epidermal and cortical cells were measured in intact roots of barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv Klondike). The effects of exogenous NO(3) (-) on Deltapsi (in the concentration range from 100 micromolar to 20 millimolar) were investigated to probe the mechanisms of nitrate uptake by the high-affinity (HATS) and low-affinity (LATS) transport systems for NO(3) (-) uptake. Both transport systems caused depolarization of Deltapsi, demonstrating that the LATS (like the HATS) for NO(3) (-) uptake is probably mediated by an electrogenic cation (H(+)?) cotransport system. Membrane depolarization by the HATS was "inducible" by NO(3) (-), and saturable with respect to exogenous [NO(3) (-)]. By contrast, depolarization by the LATS was constitutive, and first-order in response to external [NO(3) (-)]. H(+) fluxes, measured in 200 micromolar and in 5 millimolar Ca(NO(3))(2) solutions, failed to alkalinize external media as anticipated for a 2 H(+):1 NO(3) (-) symport. However, switching from K(2)SO(4) solutions (which were strongly acidifying) to KNO(3) solutions at the same K(+) concentration caused marked reductions in H(+) efflux. These observations are consistent with NO(3) (-) uptake by the HATS and the LATS via 2 H(+):1 NO(3) (-) symports. These observations establish that the HATS for nitrate uptake by barley roots is essentially similar to those reported for Lemna and Zea mays by earlier workers. There are, nevertheless, distinct differences between barley and corn in their quantitative responses to external NO(3) (-).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plant Nitrogen Assimilation and Use Efficiency
Xu, G., Fan, X., & Miller, A. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105532 · Cited by 2,114
STITT, M., & KRAPP, A. (1999) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00386.x · Cited by 1,044
Futile transmembrane NH 4 + cycling: A cellular hypothesis to explain ammonium toxicity in plants
Britto, D. T., Siddiqi, M. Y., Glass, A. D. M., & Kronzucker, H. J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.061034698 · Cited by 555
Self-citationEffects of Common Soil Anions and PH on the Uptake and Accumulation of Perchlorate in Lettuce
Seyfferth, A. L., Henderson, M. K., & Parker, D. R. (2008) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-007-9461-8 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Glass, A. D. M., Shaff, J. E., & Kochian, L. V.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-06-01
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 456-463
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2026710283
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Studies of the Uptake of Nitrate in Barley: IV. Electrophysiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.99.2.456
- The paper
- Glass, A. D. M., Shaff, J. E., & Kochian, L. V. (1992). Studies of the Uptake of Nitrate in Barley: IV. Electrophysiology. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.99.2.456
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.