The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Root Respiration Associated with Ammonium and Nitrate Absorption and Assimilation by Barley
Open accessAbstract
We examined nitrate assimilation and root gas fluxes in a wild-type barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv Steptoe), a mutant (nar1a) deficient in NADH nitrate reductase, and a mutant (nar1a;nar7w) deficient in both NADH and NAD(P)H nitrate reductases. Estimates of in vivo nitrate assimilation from excised roots and whole plants indicated that the nar1a mutation influences assimilation only in the shoot and that exposure to NO(3) (-) induced shoot nitrate reduction more slowly than root nitrate reduction in all three genotypes. When plants that had been deprived of nitrogen for several days were exposed to ammonium, root carbon dioxide evolution and oxygen consumption increased markedly, but respiratory quotient-the ratio of carbon dioxide evolved to oxygen consumed-did not change. A shift from ammonium to nitrate nutrition stimulated root carbon dioxide evolution slightly and inhibited oxygen consumption in the wild type and nar1a mutant, but had negligible effects on root gas fluxes in the nar1a;nar7w mutant. These results indicate that, under NH(4) (+) nutrition, 14% of root carbon catabolism is coupled to NH(4) (+) absorption and assimilation and that, under NO(3) (-) nutrition, 5% of root carbon catabolism is coupled to NO(3) (-) absorption, 15% to NO(3) (-) assimilation, and 3% to NH(4) (+) assimilation. The additional energy requirements of NO(3) (-) assimilation appear to diminish root mitochondrial electron transport. Thus, the energy requirements of NH(4) (+) and NO(3) (-) absorption and assimilation constitute a significant portion of root respiration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
STITT, M., & KRAPP, A. (1999) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00386.x · Cited by 1,044
Freschet, G. T., Pagès, L., Iversen, C. M., Comas, L. H., Rewald, B., Roumet, C., Klimešová, J., Zadworny, M., Poorter, H., Postma, J. A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17572 · Cited by 668
Futile transmembrane NH 4 + cycling: A cellular hypothesis to explain ammonium toxicity in plants
Britto, D. T., Siddiqi, M. Y., Glass, A. D. M., & Kronzucker, H. J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.061034698 · Cited by 555
The deposition of atmospheric ammonia and its effects on plants
PEARSON, J., & STEWART, G. R. (1993) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03882.x · Cited by 396
Overview of the physiological ecology of carbon metabolism in seagrasses
Touchette, B. W., & Burkholder, J. M. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0022-0981(00)00196-9 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Bloom, A. J., Sukrapanna, S. S., & Warner, R. L.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-08-01
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1294-1301
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2005898250
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Root Respiration Associated with Ammonium and Nitrate Absorption and Assimilation by Barley. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.99.4.1294
- The paper
- Bloom, A. J., Sukrapanna, S. S., & Warner, R. L. (1992). Root Respiration Associated with Ammonium and Nitrate Absorption and Assimilation by Barley. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.99.4.1294
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.