The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contrapuntal Networks of Gene Expression during Arabidopsis Seed Filling[W]
Open accessAbstract
We have used cDNA microarrays to examine changes in gene expression during Arabidopsis seed development and to compare wild-type and mutant wrinkled1 (wri1) seeds that have an 80% reduction in oil. Between 5 and 13 days after flowering, a period preceding and including the major accumulation of storage oils and proteins, ∼35% of the genes represented on the array changed at least twofold, but a larger fraction (65%) showed little or no change in expression. Genes whose expression changed most tended to be expressed more in seeds than in other tissues. Genes related to the biosynthesis of storage components showed several distinct temporal expression patterns. For example, a number of genes encoding core fatty acid synthesis enzymes displayed a bell-shaped pattern of expression between 5 and 13 days after flowering. By contrast, the expression of storage proteins, oleosins, and other known abscisic acid–regulated genes increased later and remained high. Genes for photosynthetic proteins followed a pattern very similar to that of fatty acid synthesis proteins, implicating a role in CO2 refixation and the supply of cofactors for oil synthesis. Expression profiles of key carbon transporters and glycolytic enzymes reflected shifts in flux from cytosolic to plastid metabolism. Despite major changes in metabolism between wri1 and wild-type seeds, <1% of genes differed by more than twofold, and most of these were involved in central lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. Thus, these data define in part the downstream responses to disruption of the WRI1 gene.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
Cited by
Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuel production: perspectives and advances
Hu, Q., Sommerfeld, M., Jarvis, E., Ghirardi, M., Posewitz, M., Seibert, M., & Darzins, A. (2008) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03492.x · Cited by 3,745
SUGAR SENSING AND SIGNALING IN PLANTS: Conserved and Novel Mechanisms
Rolland, F., Baena-Gonzalez, E., & Sheen, J. (2006) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105441 · Cited by 2,328
TCP genes: a family snapshot ten years later
Martín-Trillo, M., & Cubas, P. (2010) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.003 · Cited by 819
Schluepmann, H., Pellny, T., van Dijken, A., Smeekens, S., & Paul, M. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1132018100 · Cited by 490
National Algal Biofuels Technology Roadmap
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), O. O. S. T. B. T. O. (., Ferrell, J., US Department of Energy (USDOE), W., & Sarisky-Reed, V. (2010) · doi:10.2172/1218560 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruuska, S. A., Girke, T., Benning, C., & Ohlrogge, J. B.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-06-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1191-1206
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2123116714
- Cited by
- 562
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contrapuntal Networks of Gene Expression during Arabidopsis Seed Filling[W]. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.000877
- The paper
- Ruuska, S. A., Girke, T., Benning, C., & Ohlrogge, J. B. (2002). Contrapuntal Networks of Gene Expression during Arabidopsis Seed Filling[W]. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.000877
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.