The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Cloning and Characterization of Glucanase Inhibitor Proteins: Coevolution of a Counterdefense Mechanism by Plant Pathogens
Open accessAbstract
A characteristic plant response to microbial attack is the production of endo-beta-1,3-glucanases, which are thought to play an important role in plant defense, either directly, through the degradation of beta-1,3/1,6-glucans in the pathogen cell wall, or indirectly, by releasing oligosaccharide elicitors that induce additional plant defenses. We report the sequencing and characterization of a class of proteins, termed glucanase inhibitor proteins (GIPs), that are secreted by the oomycete Phytophthora sojae, a pathogen of soybean, and that specifically inhibit the endoglucanase activity of their plant host. GIPs are homologous with the trypsin class of Ser proteases but are proteolytically nonfunctional because one or more residues of the essential catalytic triad is absent. However, specific structural features are conserved that are characteristic of protein-protein interactions, suggesting a mechanism of action that has not been described previously in plant pathogen studies. We also report the identification of two soybean endoglucanases: EGaseA, which acts as a high-affinity ligand for GIP1; and EGaseB, with which GIP1 does not show any association. In vitro, GIP1 inhibits the EGaseA-mediated release of elicitor-active glucan oligosaccharides from P. sojae cell walls. Furthermore, GIPs and soybean endoglucanases interact in vivo during pathogenesis in soybean roots. GIPs represent a novel counterdefensive weapon used by plant pathogens to suppress a plant defense response and potentially function as important pathogenicity determinants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
[2] Families of serine peptidases
Rawlings, N. D., & Barrett, A. J. (1994) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/0076-6879(94)44004-2 · Cited by 629
Sharp, J. K., Valent, B., & Albersheim, P. (1984) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)90864-1 · Cited by 295
Self-citation
Cited by
Significance of Inducible Defense-related Proteins in Infected Plants
van Loon, L. C., Rep, M., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2006) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143425 · Cited by 3,410
An Arabidopsis Callose Synthase, GSL5, Is Required for Wound and Papillary Callose Formation
Jacobs, A. K., Lipka, V., Burton, R. A., Panstruga, R., Strizhov, N., Schulze-Lefert, P., & Fincher, G. B. (2003) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.016097 · Cited by 559
Molecular Genetics of Pathogenic Oomycetes
Kamoun, S. (2003) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.2.2.191-199.2003 · Cited by 371
Filamentous pathogen effector functions: of pathogens, hosts and microbiomes
Rovenich, H., Boshoven, J. C., & Thomma, B. P. (2014) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2014.05.001 · Cited by 288
Using AlphaFold Multimer to discover interkingdom protein–protein interactions
Homma, F., Lyu, J., & van der Hoorn, R. A. L. (2024) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.16969 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Rose, J. K. C., Ham, K.-S., Darvill, A. G., & Albersheim, P.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1329-1345
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2127703237
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Cloning and Characterization of Glucanase Inhibitor Proteins: Coevolution of a Counterdefense Mechanism by Plant Pathogens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.002253
- The paper
- Rose, J. K. C., Ham, K.-S., Darvill, A. G., & Albersheim, P. (2002). Molecular Cloning and Characterization of Glucanase Inhibitor Proteins: Coevolution of a Counterdefense Mechanism by Plant Pathogens. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.002253
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.