The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mutations in the Dof Zinc Finger Genes DAG2 and DAG1 Influence with Opposite Effects the Germination of Arabidopsis Seeds
Open accessAbstract
We describe the Arabidopsis gene DAG2 encoding a Dof zinc finger protein and show that it is involved in the control of seed germination. An Arabidopsis mutant line with a T-DNA insertion in DAG2 isolated by reverse genetics produces seeds that are substantially more dependent than the wild type on the physical stimuli-light and cold treatment-that promote germination. Mutant dag2 seeds also are less sensitive to the germination-promotive effect of gibberellins, because a 10-fold higher amount of gibberellins is needed to restore germination when endogenous gibberellin biosynthesis is blocked. The seed germination characteristics of the dag2 mutant are opposite to those of dag1, a knockout mutant of another Dof gene (DAG1) that we showed previously to be involved in the control of seed germination, and are similar to those of plants that overexpress DAG1. The promoter of the DAG2 gene is active specifically in the vascular system of the mother plant but not in the embryo, and segregation analysis indicates that the effect of the dag2 mutation is maternal. Both characteristics are in common with DAG1; additionally, the DAG1 and DAG2 proteins share high sequence homology and an identical zinc finger domain. These data suggest, and the germination phenotype of the double mutant is compatible with, a model whereby the zinc finger proteins DAG1 and DAG2 act on a maternal switch that controls seed germination, possibly by regulating the same gene(s).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early flower development in Arabidopsis.
Smyth, D. R., Bowman, J. L., & Meyerowitz, E. M. (1990) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.2.8.755 · Cited by 2,155
Cited by
Molecular Aspects of Seed Dormancy
Finkelstein, R., Reeves, W., Ariizumi, T., & Steber, C. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092740 · Cited by 1,379
Comparative population genomics of maize domestication and improvement
Hufford, M. B., Xu, X., van Heerwaarden, J., Pyhäjärvi, T., Chia, J.-M., Cartwright, R. A., Elshire, R. J., Glaubitz, J. C., Guill, K. E., Kaeppler, S. M., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2309 · Cited by 960
Cloning of DOG1 , a quantitative trait locus controlling seed dormancy in Arabidopsis
Bentsink, L., Jowett, J., Hanhart, C. J., & Koornneef, M. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0607877103 · Cited by 630
Completing the cycle: maternal effects as the missing link in plant life histories
Donohue, K. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0291 · Cited by 459
Bentsink, L., & Koornneef, M. (2008) · The Arabidopsis Book · doi:10.1199/tab.0119 · Cited by 422
Metadata
- Authors
- Gualberti, G., Papi, M., Bellucci, L., Ricci, I., Bouchez, D., Camilleri, C., Costantino, P., & Vittorioso, P.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1253-1263
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2114312655
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.