The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Large-Scale Screen for Artificial Selection in Maize Identifies Candidate Agronomic Loci for Domestication and Crop Improvement
Open accessAbstract
Maize (Zea mays subsp mays) was domesticated from teosinte (Z. mays subsp parviglumis) through a single domestication event in southern Mexico between 6000 and 9000 years ago. This domestication event resulted in the original maize landrace varieties, which were spread throughout the Americas by Native Americans and adapted to a wide range of environmental conditions. Starting with landraces, 20th century plant breeders selected inbred lines of maize for use in hybrid maize production. Both domestication and crop improvement involved selection of specific alleles at genes controlling key morphological and agronomic traits, resulting in reduced genetic diversity relative to unselected genes. Here, we sequenced 1095 maize genes from a sample of 14 inbred lines and chose 35 genes with zero sequence diversity as potential targets of selection. These 35 genes were then sequenced in a sample of diverse maize landraces and teosintes and tested for selection. Using two statistical tests, we identified eight candidate genes. Extended gene sequencing of these eight candidate loci confirmed that six were selected throughout the gene, and the remaining two exhibited evidence of selection in the 3′ portion of each gene. The selected genes have functions consistent with agronomic selection for nutritional quality, maturity, and productivity. Our large-scale screen for artificial selection allows identification of genes of potential agronomic importance even when gene function and the phenotype of interest are unknown.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical significance for genomewide studies
Storey, J. D., & Tibshirani, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · Cited by 9,692
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. II. Error Probabilities
Ewing, B., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.186 · Cited by 5,439
The limits of selection during maize domestication
Wang, R.-L., Stec, A., Hey, J., Lukens, L., & Doebley, J. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/18435 · Cited by 740
Self-citationThe role of barren stalk1 in the architecture of maize
Gallavotti, A., Zhao, Q., Kyozuka, J., Meeley, R. B., Ritter, M. K., Doebley, J. F., Enrico Pè, M., & Schmidt, R. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03148 · Cited by 365
Self-citation
Cited by
Stinchcombe, J. R., & Hoekstra, H. E. (2008) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800937 · Cited by 622
SNP discovery via 454 transcriptome sequencing
Barbazuk, W. B., Emrich, S. J., Chen, H. D., Li, L., & Schnable, P. S. (2007) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03193.x · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamasaki, M., Tenaillon, M. I., Vroh Bi, I., Schroeder, S. G., Sanchez-Villeda, H., Doebley, J. F., Gaut, B. S., & McMullen, M. D.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-10-14
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2859-2872
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2102222986
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Large-Scale Screen for Artificial Selection in Maize Identifies Candidate Agronomic Loci for Domestication and Crop Improvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.105.037242
- The paper
- Yamasaki, M., Tenaillon, M. I., Vroh Bi, I., Schroeder, S. G., Sanchez-Villeda, H., Doebley, J. F., Gaut, B. S., & McMullen, M. D. (2005). A Large-Scale Screen for Artificial Selection in Maize Identifies Candidate Agronomic Loci for Domestication and Crop Improvement. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.037242
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.