Arabidopsis CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON3 Regulates Postembryonic Shoot Meristem and Organ Boundary Formation
Open accessAbstract
Overall shoot architecture in higher plants is highly dependent on the activity of embryonic and axillary shoot meristems, which are produced from the basal adaxial boundaries of cotyledons and leaves, respectively. In Arabidopsis thaliana, redundant functions of the CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON genes CUC1, CUC2, and CUC3 regulate embryonic shoot meristem formation and cotyledon boundary specification. Their functional importance and relationship in postembryonic development, however, is poorly understood. Here, we performed extensive analyses of the embryonic and postembryonic functions of the three CUC genes using multiple combinations of newly isolated mutant alleles. We found significant roles of CUC2 and CUC3, but not CUC1, in axillary meristem formation and boundary specification of various postembryonic shoot organs, such as leaves, stems, and pedicels. In embryogenesis, all three genes make significant contributions, although CUC3 appears to possess, at least partially, a distinct function from that of CUC1 and CUC2. The function of CUC3 and CUC2 overlaps that of LATERAL SUPPRESSOR, which was previously shown to be required for axillary meristem formation. Our results reveal that redundant but partially distinct functions of CUC1, CUC2, and CUC3 are responsible for shoot organ boundary and meristem formation throughout the life cycle in Arabidopsis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 387
- Authors
- Hibara, K.-I., Karim, M. R., Takada, S., Taoka, K.-I., Furutani, M., Aida, M., & Tasaka, M.
- Affiliations
- Nara Institute of Science and Technology (JP)
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-11-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2946-2957
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- PMC
- PMC1693926
- OpenAlex
- W1978500002
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 15.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- The Plant Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Arizona Biomedical Research Commission
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
- Keywords
- CUC1, CUC2, postembryonic development, gene redundancy, Arabidopsis thaliana
- MeSH terms
- Alleles, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Phenotype, RNA, Messenger, Seeds, Transcription Factors, Arabidopsis, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Meristem, Arabidopsis Proteins, Seedlings, Embryonic Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review