The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FLOWERING LOCUS T Protein May Act as the Long-Distance Florigenic Signal in the Cucurbits
Open accessAbstract
Cucurbita moschata, a cucurbit species responsive to inductive short-day (SD) photoperiods, and Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) were used to test whether long-distance movement of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) mRNA or FT is required for floral induction. Ectopic expression of FT by ZYMV was highly effective in mediating floral induction of long-day (LD)–treated plants. Moreover, the infection zone of ZYMV was far removed from floral meristems, suggesting that FT transcripts do not function as the florigenic signal in this system. Heterografting demonstrated efficient transmission of a florigenic signal from flowering Cucurbita maxima stocks to LD-grown C. moschata scions. Real-time RT-PCR performed on phloem sap collected from C. maxima stocks detected no FT transcripts, whereas mass spectrometry of phloem sap proteins revealed the presence of Cm-FTL1 and Cm-FTL2. Importantly, studies on LD- and SD-treated C. moschata plants established that Cmo-FTL1 and Cmo-FTL2 are regulated by photoperiod at the level of movement into the phloem and not by transcription. Finally, mass spectrometry of florally induced heterografted C. moschata scions revealed that C. maxima FT, but not FT mRNA, crossed the graft union in the phloem translocation stream. Collectively, these studies are consistent with FT functioning as a component of the florigenic signaling system in the cucurbits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · Cited by 21,937
Hd3a protein is a mobile flowering signal in rice
Tamaki, S., Matsuo, S., Wong, H. L., Yokoi, S., & Shimamoto, K. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1141753 · Cited by 1,248
Cited by
The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues
Andrés, F., & Coupland, G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3291 · Cited by 1,538
Seasonal and developmental timing of flowering
Amasino, R. (2010) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2010.04148.x · Cited by 894
The Plant Vascular System: Evolution, Development and Functions F
Lucas, W. J., Groover, A., Lichtenberger, R., Furuta, K., Yadav, S., Helariutta, Y., He, X., Fukuda, H., Kang, J., Brady, S. M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.12041 · Cited by 772
Self-citationYu, S., Galvão, V. C., Zhang, Y.-C., Horrer, D., Zhang, T.-Q., Hao, Y.-H., Feng, Y.-Q., Wang, S., Schmid, M., & Wang, J.-W. (2012) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.112.101014 · Cited by 469
Evolutionary genetics of plant adaptation
Anderson, J. T., Willis, J. H., & Mitchell-Olds, T. (2011) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2011.04.001 · Cited by 434
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, M.-K., Belanger, H., Lee, Y.-J., Varkonyi-Gasic, E., Taoka, K.-I., Miura, E., Xoconostle-Cázares, B., Gendler, K., Jorgensen, R. A., Phinney, B., Lough, T. J., & Lucas, W. J.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-05-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1488-1506
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2122341399
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 41.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FLOWERING LOCUS T Protein May Act as the Long-Distance Florigenic Signal in the Cucurbits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.107.051920
- The paper
- Lin, M.-K., Belanger, H., Lee, Y.-J., Varkonyi-Gasic, E., Taoka, K.-I., Miura, E., Xoconostle-Cázares, B., Gendler, K., Jorgensen, R. A., Phinney, B., Lough, T. J., & Lucas, W. J. (2007). FLOWERING LOCUS T Protein May Act as the Long-Distance Florigenic Signal in the Cucurbits. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.107.051920
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.