The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative Analysis between Homoeologous Genome Segments of Brassica napus and Its Progenitor Species Reveals Extensive Sequence-Level Divergence
Open accessAbstract
Homoeologous regions of Brassica genomes were analyzed at the sequence level. These represent segments of the Brassica A genome as found in Brassica rapa and Brassica napus and the corresponding segments of the Brassica C genome as found in Brassica oleracea and B. napus. Analysis of synonymous base substitution rates within modeled genes revealed a relatively broad range of times (0.12 to 1.37 million years ago) since the divergence of orthologous genome segments as represented in B. napus and the diploid species. Similar, and consistent, ranges were also identified for single nucleotide polymorphism and insertion-deletion variation. Genes conserved across the Brassica genomes and the homoeologous segments of the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana showed almost perfect collinearity. Numerous examples of apparent transduplication of gene fragments, as previously reported in B. oleracea, were observed in B. rapa and B. napus, indicating that this phenomenon is widespread in Brassica species. In the majority of the regions studied, the C genome segments were expanded in size relative to their A genome counterparts. The considerable variation that we observed, even between the different versions of the same Brassica genome, for gene fragments and annotated putative genes suggest that the concept of the pan-genome might be particularly appropriate when considering Brassica genomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes
Kurtz, S., Phillippy, A., Delcher, A. L., Smoot, M., Shumway, M., Antonescu, C., & Salzberg, S. L. (2004) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12 · Cited by 5,254
The ABC’s of comparative genomics in the Brassicaceae: building blocks of crucifer genomes
Schranz, M. E., Lysak, M. A., & Mitchell-Olds, T. (2006) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2006.09.002 · Cited by 575
Cited by
The Brassica oleracea genome reveals the asymmetrical evolution of polyploid genomes
Liu, S., Liu, Y., Yang, X., Tong, C., Edwards, D., Parkin, I. A. P., Zhao, M., Ma, J., Yu, J., Huang, S., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4930 · Cited by 1,161
Self-citationInsights into the Maize Pan-Genome and Pan-Transcriptome
Hirsch, C. N., Foerster, J. M., Johnson, J. M., Sekhon, R. S., Muttoni, G., Vaillancourt, B., Peñagaricano, F., Lindquist, E., Pedraza, M. A., Barry, K., et al. (2014) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.113.119982 · Cited by 572
Molecular, genetic and evolutionary analysis of a paracentric inversion in Arabidopsis thaliana
Fransz, P., Linc, G., Lee, C., Aflitos, S. A., Lasky, J. R., Toomajian, C., Ali, H., Peters, J., van Dam, P., Ji, X., et al. (2016) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13262 · Cited by 94
Weber, N., Halpin, C., Hannah, L. C., Jez, J. M., Kough, J., & Parrott, W. (2012) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.112.204271 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheung, F., Trick, M., Drou, N., Lim, Y. P., Park, J.-Y., Kwon, S.-J., Kim, J.-A., Scott, R., Pires, J. C., Paterson, A. H., Town, C., & Bancroft, I.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-07-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1912-1928
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2135058845
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Analysis between Homoeologous Genome Segments of Brassica napus and Its Progenitor Species Reveals Extensive Sequence-Level Divergence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.108.060376
- The paper
- Cheung, F., Trick, M., Drou, N., Lim, Y. P., Park, J.-Y., Kwon, S.-J., Kim, J.-A., Scott, R., Pires, J. C., Paterson, A. H., Town, C., & Bancroft, I. (2009). Comparative Analysis between Homoeologous Genome Segments of Brassica napus and Its Progenitor Species Reveals Extensive Sequence-Level Divergence. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.060376
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.