Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Study of New Arabidopsis Chloroplast RNA Editing Mutants Reveals General Features of Editing Factors and Their Target Sites

Open access
Hammani, Kamel, Okuda, Kenji, Tanz, Sandra K., Chateigner-Boutin, Anne-Laure, Shikanai, Toshiharu, Small, Ian·2009·The Plant Cell

Abstract

RNA editing in higher plant organelles results in the conversion of specific cytidine residues to uridine residues in RNA. The recognition of a specific target C site by the editing machinery involves trans-acting factors that bind to the RNA upstream of the C to be edited. In the last few years, analysis of mutants affected in chloroplast biogenesis has identified several pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins from the PLS subfamily that are essential for the editing of particular RNA transcripts. We selected other genes from the same subfamily and used a reverse genetics approach to identify six new chloroplast editing factors in Arabidopsis thaliana (OTP80, OTP81, OTP82, OTP84, OTP85, and OTP86). These six factors account for nine editing sites not previously assigned to an editing factor and, together with the nine PPR editing proteins previously described, explain more than half of the 34 editing events in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. OTP80, OTP81, OTP85, and OTP86 target only one editing site each, OTP82 two sites, and OTP84 three sites in different transcripts. An analysis of the target sites requiring the five editing factors involved in editing of multiple sites (CRR22, CRR28, CLB19, OTP82, and OTP84) suggests that editing factors can generally distinguish pyrimidines from purines and, at some positions, must be able to recognize specific bases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1105/tpc.109.071472

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Sequence-specific binding of single-stranded RNA: is there a code for recognition?

    Auweter, S. D., Oberstrass, F. C., & Allain, F. H.-T. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkl620 · Cited by 314 · cited 1×

    “RNA nucleotides tend to interact base-specifically with proteins in one of two ways: via stacking interactions with the aromatic rings or via hydrogen bonding.Sequencespecificitycanbeachievedbypositivebasespecific bonding interactions or by negative steric hindrance ( Auweter et al., 2006 ).”
    Background

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Hammani, K., Okuda, K., Tanz, S. K., Chateigner-Boutin, A.-L., Shikanai, T., & Small, I.
Venue
The Plant Cell
Published
2009-11-01
Volume
21
Issue
11
Pages
3686-3699
ISSN
  • 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-298X
OpenAlex
W2095687891
Cited by
191
References
1
FWCI
8.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Study of New Arabidopsis Chloroplast RNA Editing Mutants Reveals General Features of Editing Factors and Their Target Sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.109.071472
The paper
Hammani, K., Okuda, K., Tanz, S. K., Chateigner-Boutin, A.-L., Shikanai, T., & Small, I. (2009). A Study of New Arabidopsis Chloroplast RNA Editing Mutants Reveals General Features of Editing Factors and Their Target Sites. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.071472

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.