The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Study of New Arabidopsis Chloroplast RNA Editing Mutants Reveals General Features of Editing Factors and Their Target Sites
Open accessAbstract
RNA editing in higher plant organelles results in the conversion of specific cytidine residues to uridine residues in RNA. The recognition of a specific target C site by the editing machinery involves trans-acting factors that bind to the RNA upstream of the C to be edited. In the last few years, analysis of mutants affected in chloroplast biogenesis has identified several pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins from the PLS subfamily that are essential for the editing of particular RNA transcripts. We selected other genes from the same subfamily and used a reverse genetics approach to identify six new chloroplast editing factors in Arabidopsis thaliana (OTP80, OTP81, OTP82, OTP84, OTP85, and OTP86). These six factors account for nine editing sites not previously assigned to an editing factor and, together with the nine PPR editing proteins previously described, explain more than half of the 34 editing events in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. OTP80, OTP81, OTP85, and OTP86 target only one editing site each, OTP82 two sites, and OTP84 three sites in different transcripts. An analysis of the target sites requiring the five editing factors involved in editing of multiple sites (CRR22, CRR28, CLB19, OTP82, and OTP84) suggests that editing factors can generally distinguish pyrimidines from purines and, at some positions, must be able to recognize specific bases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sequence-specific binding of single-stranded RNA: is there a code for recognition?
Auweter, S. D., Oberstrass, F. C., & Allain, F. H.-T. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkl620 · Cited by 314 · cited 1×
“RNA nucleotides tend to interact base-specifically with proteins in one of two ways: via stacking interactions with the aromatic rings or via hydrogen bonding.Sequencespecificitycanbeachievedbypositivebasespecific bonding interactions or by negative steric hindrance ( Auweter et al., 2006 ).”
Background
Cited by
RNA Editing in Plants and Its Evolution
Takenaka, M., Zehrmann, A., Verbitskiy, D., Härtel, B., & Brennicke, A. (2013) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133519 · Cited by 435
Takenaka, M., Zehrmann, A., Verbitskiy, D., Kugelmann, M., Härtel, B., & Brennicke, A. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1202452109 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Hammani, K., Okuda, K., Tanz, S. K., Chateigner-Boutin, A.-L., Shikanai, T., & Small, I.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-11-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3686-3699
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2095687891
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Study of New Arabidopsis Chloroplast RNA Editing Mutants Reveals General Features of Editing Factors and Their Target Sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.109.071472
- The paper
- Hammani, K., Okuda, K., Tanz, S. K., Chateigner-Boutin, A.-L., Shikanai, T., & Small, I. (2009). A Study of New Arabidopsis Chloroplast RNA Editing Mutants Reveals General Features of Editing Factors and Their Target Sites. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.071472
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.