Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cyclin-Dependent Kinases and Cell Division in Plants—The Nexus

Open access
Mironov, Vladimir, De Veylder, Lieven, Van Montagu, Marc, Inzé, Dirk·1999·The Plant Cell

Abstract

Cell division is one of the most conspicuous features of life, and thus several elements of the control of cell division are common to both prokaryotes and eukaryotes (Amon, 1998; Leatherwood, 1998). The degree of evolutionary conservation is especially striking among eukaryotes, where progression through the successive phases of the cell cycle (S, G2, M, and G1) in species as diverse as yeast and humans is driven by a common class of heterodimeric serine/threonine protein kinases. These kinases consist of a catalytic subunit, termed cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK), and an activating subunit, cyclin (reviewed in Nigg, 1995). The first indication that this commonality might extend to the plant kingdom came with the identification of a plant protein immunologically related to the CDKs (John et al., 1989), a finding that was followed by the cloning of a cDNA fragment encoding a CDK-like protein from pea (Feiler and Jacobs, 1990). Subsequently, it became clear that several putative CDKs and cyclins are present in each plant species and that at least some of them are pertinent to our understanding of cell division control (Hemerly et al., 1995; Doerner et al., 1996). Several questions nevertheless remain to be addressed. For example, which putative cyclins and CDKs are involved in cell division control in plants? What are their particular functions? How is their activity regulated? Here, we focus on molecular control of the cell cycle in higher plants and do not deal with the developmental and environmental control of cell division. For more information on these latter issues, the reader is referred elsewhere (Francis et al., 1998). Intensive cloning efforts over the past 7 years have identified a large number of CDK-like proteins (referred to as CDKs hereafter) in diverse plant species, among which at least five types can be distinguished on the basis of their sequences (see Segers et al., 1997; summarized in Table 1). The best-characterized plant CDKs belong to the A-type class. This class comprises kinases most closely related to the prototypical CDKs, yeast cdc2/CDC28 and animal CDK1 and CDK2, which share the conserved PSTAIRE motif in the cyclin binding domain. In addition to this large group of CDKs, several non-PSTAIRE CDKs have been described in plants. Some of them cannot be clearly affiliated with any other class of CDKs on the basis of sequence similarity. The situation may be even more complex in plant species that possess more than one representative of a given type of CDK, although it should be noted that not all plant species appear to possess all types of CDKs. For example, no homologs of the rice R2 kinase could be detected in Arabidopsis (Yamaguchi et al., 1998). Currently, only A and B classes of CDKs are well defined; other classes are represented only by one or two known members whose distribution in the plant kingdom remains unclear. A similar situation exists with the cyclins. Numerous cDNAs encoding putative cyclins (referred to as cyclins hereafter) have been identified in a diverse range of plant species (for a compilation, see Renaudin et al., 1996). Arabidopsis alone possesses at least 15 cyclins. Analysis of the deduced peptide sequences in the conserved “cyclin box” has enabled the classification of these cyclins into nine groups: A1, A2, A3, B1, B2, D1, D2, D3, and D4, with the lettering scheme reflecting their similarities with the mammalian cyclins A, B, and D (Table 2; Renaudin et al., 1996; De Veylder et al., 1999). More recently, cyclins with similarity to mammalian cyclin C have been identified in rice and Arabidopsis, thus adding even greater complexity to efforts to classify plant cyclins. The classification scheme described above, although helpful, does not necessarily reflect the functional properties of the cyclins. In particular, cyclins from groups A2, B1, D2, and D3 may comprise functionally distinct members, as judged by their subcellular localization and expression patterns (see below). In due course, the completion of the Arabidopsis genome sequencing project will provide definitive answers to questions regarding the profusion and diversity of plant CDKs and cyclins. Classification of CDKs in Plants At the transcriptional level. Question marks denote uncertainty. Classification of CDKs in Plants At the transcriptional level. Question marks denote uncertainty. Lately, it has become increasingly clear that certain CDKs and cyclins in yeast and animals have nothing to do with cell division control. Thus, the time is ripe to ask the question, which of the many identified plant CDKs and cyclins are actually involved in regulating the cell cycle? There is now an extensive, albeit mainly circumstantial, body of evidence that at least some plant CDKs and their associated proteins function in cell cycle control. One of the strongest arguments is the ability of many of these proteins to substitute the functions of their yeast and animal homologs (Tables 1and 2; Hata et al., 19

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1105/tpc.11.4.509

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Mironov, V., De Veylder, L., Van Montagu, M., & Inzé, D.
Venue
The Plant Cell
Published
1999-04
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
509-521
ISSN
  • 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-298X
OpenAlex
W2159379816
Cited by
347
References
0
FWCI
57.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cyclin-Dependent Kinases and Cell Division in Plants—The Nexus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.11.4.509
The paper
Mironov, V., De Veylder, L., Van Montagu, M., & Inzé, D. (1999). Cyclin-Dependent Kinases and Cell Division in Plants—The Nexus. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.11.4.509

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.