Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Proteins for Transport of Water and Mineral Nutrients across the Membranes of Plant Cells

Open access
Chrispeels, Maarten J., Crawford, Nigel M., Schroeder, Julian I.·1999·The Plant Cell

Abstract

The uptake and transport of water and mineral ions are among the oldest subjects in plant physiology, and numerous studies have described these processes at the whole-plant level and at the organ level (e.g., with excised roots). Subsequent work was based on isolated membrane vesicles and electrophysiology to characterize transport processes at the level of the membrane. The recent cloning of the genes for a large number of transport proteins and the availability of knockout mutants make it possible to dissect transport processes in greater detail and to begin to understand the interactions between ion uptake processes that had often been observed at the organ level. This article summarizes recent progress in characterizing the genes and the proteins involved in transporting water and major mineral nutrients. The plasma membrane of the plant cell is a selectively permeable barrier that ensures the entry of essential ions and metabolites into the cell. Together with the vacuolar membrane (tonoplast), it permits the cytoplasm to maintain intracellular homeostasis. These membranes consist primarily of phospholipid bilayers with transmembrane proteins that permit the traversing of water, ions, and metabolites and the maintenance of a cytosolic pH that is one to three units higher than that of the cell exterior or the vacuole. Pure phospholipid bilayers are permeable to gases, such as O2 and CO2, but they are barely permeable to water and nearly impermeable to inorganic ions and other hydrophilic solutes, such as sucrose and amino acids. Proteins are required to transport protons, inorganic ions, and organic solutes across the plasma membrane and the tonoplast at rates sufficient to meet the needs of the cell. Membranes contain different types of transport proteins: ATPases or ATP-powered pumps, channel proteins, and cotransporters (for other reviews on this topic, see Lalonde et al., 1999; Sze et al., 1999, in this issue). Some of these proteins are well characterized, and their subcellular location is known. The cDNAs for others have been cloned, but functional, biochemical, and cytological data are lacking. ATPases utilize the energy released upon hydrolysis of ATP to move ions across the plasma membrane against chemical and electrical gradients. In plant cells, H +-ATPases pump protons across the plasma membrane or tonoplast to acidify the extracellular matrix or the vacuole, respectively (Sze et al., 1999). Channel proteins facilitate the diffusion of water and ions down energetically favorable gradients. These proteins form channels through which ions or water molecules pass in single file at very rapid rates—up to 106 to 107 per sec per channel. The activities of channels can be regulated: they can be opened and closed. In plant cells, both water and ion channels have been studied in detail. Cotransporters, the third class of membrane-transport proteins, can move solutes either up or down gradients at rates of 102 to 104 molecules per second. However, depending on the conditions under which they are assayed, transporters sometimes behave like channels, and vice versa, so that the distinction between them is no longer clear. Classical models assumed that ion channels and cotransporters are clearly distinct proteins. However, recent single-channel studies on animal transporters have demonstrated that cotransporters can also function as ion channels (Fairman et al., 1995; Cammack and Schwartz, 1996). Therefore, animal researchers no longer distinguish strictly between ion channels and cotransporters, and models explaining channel modes of transporters have been derived (Larsson et al., 1996; Su et al., 1996). In plant systems, analysis of the wheat HKT1 transporter has provided evidence for two modes of transport by the same protein (Rubio et al., 1995; Gassmann et al., 1996). Among the cotransporters, we distinguish uniporters, antiporters, and symporters. Uniporters, like channels, move substances down a concentration gradient, albeit much more slowly. Antiporters, also called exchangers, and symporters can move a given substance against its own concentration gradient, the energy requirement for which comes not from ATP but rather is satisfied by an electric potential and/or chemical gradient of a secondary substance. The movement of a solute against its concentration gradient is thus coupled to the movement of the secondary substance—in plants this is often a proton—down its concentration gradient. Thus, the high proton concentration in the apoplast powers the inward movement of certain ions, such as nitrate, by a symporter. Proton gradients can similarly power the movement of ions into the vacuole by the proton–sodium antiporter or the proton–calcium antiporter. The ionic compositions of the solutions on either side of both plasma membrane and tonoplast are very different. Not only can the proton concentration be up to 1000 times greater in the apoplast and vacuole than in the cytosol, but gradients of c

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1105/tpc.11.4.661

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Chrispeels, M. J., Crawford, N. M., & Schroeder, J. I.
Venue
The Plant Cell
Published
1999-04
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
661-675
ISSN
  • 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-298X
OpenAlex
W2121330788
Cited by
194
References
0
FWCI
27.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proteins for Transport of Water and Mineral Nutrients across the Membranes of Plant Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.11.4.661
The paper
Chrispeels, M. J., Crawford, N. M., & Schroeder, J. I. (1999). Proteins for Transport of Water and Mineral Nutrients across the Membranes of Plant Cells. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.11.4.661

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.